Abstract 1697P
Background
Resistance to IO Tx continues to result in poor outcomes. OX40 (CD-134) mediates IO resistance. Co-stimulatory PFOX activates exhausted T-cells, and dendritic cells and increases proliferation, effector function, and survival of T cells. We hypothesized that PFOX + Axi would improve progression free survival (PFS) vs. Axi in patients (pts) with mRCC after IO Tx. The interim analysis (IA), tested this hypothesis when ≥ 33 events were observed, and rejected it (p = 0.0089) and the study was subsequently closed to new accrual.
Methods
Pts with clear cell mRCC were stratified for IMDC risk groups then randomized 1:1 to Axi 5mg po bid + PFOX 0.3mg/kg iv (Arm 1) or placebo (PL) iv (Arm 2) on Day 1 of a 2-week cycle. The primary endpoint was PFS expecting a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.5 favoring Arm 1; secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR) per RECIST v1.1, and safety/tolerability.
Results
Between Feb 2018 and Oct 2021 a total of 60 pts were randomly assigned and treated with Axi+PFOX (N=30) or Axi+PL (N=30). As of April 2024, 51 PFS events had occurred. The study did not meet its primary endpoint of PFS. At a median follow up of 37.8 mo, median PFS was 9.5 (95% CI: 5.9-14.5) mo. for Arm 1 vs. 8.5 (95% CI: 5.5-11) mo. for Arm 2 (HR=1.02 [95% CI: 0.59-1.78] p=0.93). After adjusting by prior lines of Tx, HR=0.96 [95% CI: 0.55-1.68] p=0.89. Median OS was Arm1: 27.8 (95% CI: 18.9, 53.3) vs. Arm2: 35.7 (95% CI: 13.3, NA) (adjusted HR=1.10 [95% CI: 1.06 -4.74], adjusted by performance status, IMDC risk group and prior lines of Tx, p=0.79). Median DOR Arm1: 10.5 (range: 3.5-16.6) mo. vs Arm2 7.4 (range: 1.8-18.4) mo. 5 pts discontinued Tx due to TRAE, 3 in Arm 1 (1 grade 3 hypertension, 1 grade 2 stroke, 1 grade 3 bullous dermatitis) and 2 in Arm 2 (1 grade 4 ALT and 1 grade 3 AST elevation). Table: 1697P
Arm 1 (%) | Arm 2 (%) | |
N | 30 | 30 |
Median Age [Range] | 59 [41 – 85] | 64 [35 – 84] |
Female | 10 (34) | 7 (23) |
Male | 20 (67) | 23 (77) |
ECOG | ||
0 | 14 (47) | 10 (33) |
1 | 15 (50) | 19 (63) |
2 | 1 (3) | 1 (3) |
IMDC | ||
Good | 4 (13) | 5 (17) |
Intermediate | 21 (70) | 23 (76) |
Poor | 5 (17) | 2 (7) |
# of Prior Tx | ||
1 – 2 | 17 (57) | 18 (60) |
3+ | 13 (43) | 12 (40) |
Nephrectomy | ||
Radical | 17 (68) | 17 (63) |
Partial | 8 (32) | 10 (37) |
Site of Disease | ||
Lung | 17 (57) | 21 (70) |
Bone | 12 (40) | 9 (30) |
Liver | 7 (23) | 9 (30) |
Adrenal | 5 (17) | 7 (23) |
Pancreas | 2 (7) | 6 (20) |
Lymph Nodes | 17 (57) | 11 (37) |
TRAE | ||
Any Grade | 28 (93) | 30 (100) |
Grade 3 and 4 | 20 (67) | 15 (50) |
Diarrhea | 16 (53) | 20 (67) |
Hypertension | 16 (53) | 17 (57) |
Fatigue | 13 (43) | 15 (50) |
Nausea | 13 (43) | 11 (37) |
Best Response | ||
PR | 9 (30) | 11 (37) |
SD | 16 (53) | 15 (50) |
PD | 4 (13) | 4 (13) |
Conclusions
In IO-pretreated mRCC pts, Axi + PFOX did not improve PFS compared to Axi alone.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03092856.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Pfizer.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1636P - Health-related quality of life outcomes of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors versus taxanes versus standard of care in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Results from the ProBio trial
Presenter: Renée Bultijnck
Session: Poster session 11
1637P - Efficacy of talazoparib and enzalutamide in mCRPC patients previously treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) or docetaxel: Post hoc analysis from both cohorts in TALAPRO-2 study
Presenter: Neeraj Agarwal
Session: Poster session 11
1638P - Enzalutamide (enza) with or without leuprolide in patients (pts) with high-risk biochemically recurrent (hrBCR) prostate cancer (PC): EMBARK post hoc analysis by age
Presenter: Neal Shore
Session: Poster session 11
1639P - Self efficacy in people with prostate cancer in the UK: A large, digital survey
Presenter: Joe O'Sullivan
Session: Poster session 11
1640P - Development and validation of a machine learning-based risk model for metastatic disease in nmCRPC patients
Presenter: Ziyun Wang
Session: Poster session 11
1641P - Phase I/II trial of oral masofaniten (EPI-7386) in combination with enzalutamide (Enz) compared to enz alone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) subjects
Presenter: Christos Kyriakopoulos
Session: Poster session 11
1642P - Integrated prognostic score in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with cabazitaxel: A CABASTY posthoc analysis
Presenter: Charles Vauchier
Session: Poster session 11
1643P - Impact of PTEN alterations on clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with de novo metastatic prostate cancer (mPC)
Presenter: Bicky Thapa
Session: Poster session 11
1644P - PSA trajectories and prediction of time to no-longer clinically benefitting in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Insights from the ProBio trial
Presenter: Lana Broer
Session: Poster session 11
1645P - Tumour suppressor gene signature predicts early progression in metastatic hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients
Presenter: Marta Garcia De Herreros
Session: Poster session 11