Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini oral session: Head and neck cancer

848MO - Phase II open-label randomized study of pembrolizumab with or without bevacizumab in platinum-resistant recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC)

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Mini oral session: Head and neck cancer

Topics

Clinical Research;  Tumour Immunology;  Targeted Therapy

Tumour Site

Head and Neck Cancers

Presenters

Wan Qin Chong

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S613-S655. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1594

Authors

W.Q. Chong1, J.L. Low1, K. Sooi1, R.A. Soo1, C. le1, H.L. Teo2, J. Samol2, G. Goh3, L.R. Kong3, R. DasGupta4, S. Chia4, R. Wong3, A. Gopinathan5, J.K. Tay6, D. Eu6, R. Tsang6, K. Loh6, B.C. Tai7, Y.C. Lim3, B. Goh1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Haematology-oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, 119074 - Singapore/SG
  • 2 Medical Oncology, National Healthcare Group - Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 308433 - Singapore/SG
  • 3 -, Cancer Science Institute (CSI) - National University of Singapore (NUS), 117599 - Singapore/SG
  • 4 Genome Institute Of Singapore, A*STAR - Agency for Science, Technology and Research, 138632 - Singapore/SG
  • 5 Department Of Diagnostic Radiology, NUH - National University Hospital (S) Pte. Ltd., 119074 - Singapore/SG
  • 6 Department Of Otolaryngology - Head And Neck Surgery, NUS - National University of Singapore, 119077 - Singapore/SG
  • 7 Saw Swee Hock School Of Public Health, National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Science, 117543 - Singapore/SG

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 848MO

Background

Patients with platinum-resistant (Pt-R) R/M NPC have poor prognosis. In these patients, pembrolizumab is not superior to chemotherapy. VEGF is overexpressed in NPC and suppresses anti-tumour immune response; prior single arm studies show impressive tumour response with anti-VEGF and anti-PD1 combination. We conducted a trial to compare the efficacy of pembrolizumab with bevacizumab priming vs pembrolizumab in NPC.

Methods

Patients with Pt-R R/M NPC were randomized 1:1 to 3-weekly pembrolizumab 200mg (Arm A) or with bevacizumab 7.5mg/kg administered 1 week prior to each dose (Arm B), till progression (PD), intolerance, or up to 2 years. Crossover was allowed from Arm A to Arm B at PD. The primary endpoint was tumor response (ORR) assessed by RECIST 1.1 based on intention to treat. Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Translational studies were done on serial tumour and blood sampling to determine the immunophenotypic effects of treatments.

Results

48 patients were randomised equally to both study arms. The median follow-up was 28.3m (IQR: 15.9-55.9). Arm B had higher ORR (58.3% vs 12.5% [95% CI for difference: 18.8-72.9, p<0.001]), and longer PFS (median of 13.8m vs 1.6m [HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.50, p<0.001]) than Arm A. Median OS was 18.5m vs 11.7m (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.29-1.30, p=0.101) and grade 3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 25% (6/24) vs 8.3% (2/24) in Arms B and A respectively. Incidence of immune related AEs was similar with no grade 4-5 AEs. More patients in Arm B had >80% reduction in baseline plasma EBV DNA during treatment (70.8% vs 21.1%, p=0.001). 13 patients crossed from Arm A to Arm B: 5 (38.5%) had PR, 5 (38.5%) had SD, with median PFS of 5.0m (95% CI 2.8m-NR). Multiplex IHC of tumour showed dramatic increase in density of CD4+ and PAX5+ B cells 8 days after bevacizumab in the good responders with more modest CD8+ T cells. Arm B had increased immune cell infiltrate after 2 cycles of treatment compared with Arm A.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab and pembrolizumab is tolerable and more efficacious than pembrolizumab alone in Pt-R NPC. Mechanistically, bevacizumab enhances immune cell infiltration, specifically humoral immune responses.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03813394.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

National University Cancer Institute, Singapore.

Funding

National Medical Research Council.

Disclosure

W.Q. Chong: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, Ipsen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: MSD. R.A. Soo: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Abbvie, Amgen; Financial Interests, Advisory Board: AnHeart, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, J INTS BIO, Janssen, Lily, Merck, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Puma, Roche, Sanofi, Taiho, Takeda, Thermo Fisher, Yuhan Corporation; Financial Interests, Invited Speaker: Chugai; Financial Interests, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer. B. Goh: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bayer, Otsuka, Adagene, Novartis, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Bayer, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Genentech/ Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: BMS, MSD oncology, Adagene, MSD oncology, ALX Oncology, Taiho pharmaceutical; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD Oncology, Novartis, Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Gilead science, Regeneron, Seattle Genetics/ Estella's. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.