Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 04

1235P - Pathologic response as a surrogate endpoint for event-free survival in neo-adjuvant immunotherapy trials of resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A subgroup analysis

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 04

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Nancy Huang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S775-S793. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1600

Authors

N. Huang1, G. Shivasabesan2, S. Lord3, C.K. Lee4, P.S. Kok3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, 2145 - Westmead/AU
  • 2 Medical Oncology Department, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, 2010 - Darlinghurst/AU
  • 3 Nhmrc Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, 2050 - Sydney/AU
  • 4 Medical Oncology Department, St George Hospital Cancer Care Centre, 2217 - Kogarah/AU

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1235P

Background

A recent study demonstrated a robust correlation between pathologic complete response (pCR) and major pathologic response (MPR) with 2-year event-free survival (EFS) in neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) trials of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analysed the impact of PDL1 status and histology on the strength of these associations.

Methods

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining neoadjuvant ICI in early stage NSCLC. Study eligibility criteria were: ≥80 patients, an ICI arm (including combination ICI plus chemotherapy), pCR/MPR and EFS outcomes reported for subgroups categorised by PDL1 status and histology. Using weighted linear regression, correlations between pCR and MPR against 2-year EFS were assessed. For trial level analysis, odds ratio (OR) for pathological responses and hazard ratio (HR) for EFS were assessed. Coefficient of determination (R2) of <0.6 was considered as poor correlation and >0.7 as strong correlation.

Results

We identified five RCTs with a total of 2098 patients available for analysis. In the PDL1≥1% group, correlations between pCR and MPR vs 2-year EFS were strong (R2=0.82 and 0.96 respectively) but moderate in the PDL1<1% group (R2=0.67 and 0.64 respectively). In squamous NSCLC, correlations between pCR and MPR vs 2-year EFS were strong (R2=0.95 and 0.98). In non squamous NSCLC, correlation between pCR and 2-year EFS was weak (R2=0.55) but strong between MPR and 2-year EFS (R2= 0.79). For trial level analysis, correlation between pCR OR and HR EFS was strong in the PDL1<1% group but poor in the PDL1≥1% group (R2= 0.87 vs 0.46 respectively). Correlation was poor for pCR OR and HR EFS in both squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC (R2= 0.02 and 0.54 respectively). Limited observations for MPR and OS precluded these analyses.

Conclusions

There is strong correlation and surrogacy between pCR/MPR and EFS in resectable NSCLC with PDL1≥1%. pCR and MPR were prognostic for 2-year EFS outcomes in PDL1<1% and squamous subgroups but did not demonstrate good surrogacy at the trial level. Similarly pCR was a poor surrogate for EFS in nonsquamous NSCLC. Mature follow-up data will help to further validate pathological response as a surrogate endpoint.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

C.K. Lee: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Amgen, Roche, Janssen, Gilead, MSD, GSK, Norvatis, Merck kGA; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: AstraZeneca, Amgen, Merck kGA, Norvatis, Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.