Abstract 1168P
Background
Retrospective, single-arm, evaluation of the efficacy of different types of radioligand therapy (RLT) including 90Y or 177Lu DOTA-TATE or mix of both in advanced, unresectable progressive rectal NETG1/G2. The primary endpoint: overall survival (OS); secondary local RECIST 1.1 progression-free survival (PFS).
Methods
24 pts with advanced, unresectable, progressive rectal NETG1/G2 prior to RLT. RLT used 90Y; 177Lu DOTA-TATE or mixture of both in different regimens. Disease status and treatment response were evaluated by clinical assessment, PFS based on local RECIST 1.1 assessment and OS during follow-up. Calculation of OS and PFS using standard KM estimator, differences between groups using the Cox-Mantel test.
Results
Mean age 58.8 +/-12.8, male/female ratio 10/14. NETG1=7 and G2=17. Average of 4.5 therapy sessions, range 2 to 9, and 1.5 therapy courses per patient, range 1-3. 8 pts were treated with 90Y, 9 with 177Lu, 7 had mixed 90Y and 177Lu with 50% of each. Median OS for all 61.1 months (IQR 40-100.4). There was a significant difference in mOS between female OS=73.1 (IQR 48.9-114.0) vs. male OS=42.1 (26.5-53.4) (p=0.02), bulky liver disease >25% involvement OS=42.5 (23.9-57.1) vs. less than 25% OS=100.8 (53.5-116.3); p=0.005. No significant difference in mOS including number of therapy courses, age (below or over 58.8, years), BMI (less or over 25.8), presence of bone and other metastases also G1 vs. G2 tumors. Median PFS for all subjects (IQR) 34.7 months (16.8-43.7). Median PFS was only significantly different between bulky liver disease >25% PFS=19.3 months (IQR 14.3-23.4) vs. less than 25% liver involvement PFS=42.0m (25.5-45.0); p=0.04. There was no significant difference in mPFS including: female vs. male; number of therapy sessions, age (below or over 58.8 years), BMI (less or over 25.8), presence of bone and other metastases also G1 vs. G2 tumors.
Conclusions
Patients with advanced rectal NET1/G2 treated with different regimens of RLT do benefit in terms of improvement of OS in groups of female subjects and with low volume liver involvement. In PFS only low volume liver involvement is a predictor of PFS improvement.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
972P - Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib vs sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-center real-world study from the LINK Research Network
Presenter: Jung Yong Hong
Session: Poster session 17
973P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Overall survival using real-world data from TrinetX platform
Presenter: Lisardo Ugidos De La Varga
Session: Poster session 17
977P - Transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus tislelizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Yi Chen
Session: Poster session 17
978P - Efficacy and safety analysis of transarterial chemoembolization combined donafenib with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors in for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A prospective, single-arm, single center, phase Ⅱ clinical study
Presenter: Jinpeng Li
Session: Poster session 17
979P - Initial results from the phase II randomized trial comparing TACE with irinotecan and mitomycin C to doxorubicin in intermediate stage HCC (IRITACE trial)
Presenter: Oliver Waidmann
Session: Poster session 17