Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini oral session: Breast cancer, early stage

233MO - Ovarian function suppression in HR-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer: An exploratory analysis from the HERA trial

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Mini oral session: Breast cancer, early stage

Topics

Endocrine Therapy;  Cancer in Special Situations/ Populations

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Sung Gwe Ahn

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S309-S348. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1577

Authors

S. Moon1, S.J. Bae1, Y. Kook2, B. Seung Ho1, L. MINJI3, S.G. Ahn1, J. Jeong4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Surgery Department, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 06273 - Seoul/KR
  • 2 Breast Cancer Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 06273 - Seoul/KR
  • 3 Breast Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 06273 - Seoul/KR
  • 4 Surgery Dept., Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 06273 - Seoul/KR

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 233MO

Background

The integration of ovarian function suppression (OFS) with adjuvant endocrine therapy has shown benefit in premenopausal women with high-risk hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. However, limited data exist regarding the effectiveness of OFS in HR-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Furthermore, the optimal antihormone therapy (tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor) to pair with OFS remains unclear.

Methods

We analyzed patient-level data from the HERceptin Adjuvant (HERA) (BIG1-01; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00045032) trial to evaluate whether adding OFS improves disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in premenopausal women with early HR-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer. We also assessed the prognosis based on the type of antihormone therapy (tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor) used with OFS.

Results

The analysis included 965 patients, of which 501 (51.9%) received only tamoxifen and 464 (48.1%) received antihormonal therapy with OFS (tamoxifen [n = 269, 27.9%] or exemestane [n = 195, 20.2%]). Patients in the OFS group had significantly better 10-year DFS (OFS 70.9% vs. non-OFS 59.6%, p < 0.001) and OS (OFS 84.7% vs. non-OFS 74.0%, p < 0.001). Moreover, the addition of OFS was independently associated with improved prognosis. Among those receiving antihormonal therapy with OFS, those treated with an aromatase inhibitor demonstrated better DFS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29-0.68; p < 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.18-0.60; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our results support the addition of OFS to antihormonal therapy as a reasonable strategy in premenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer who are undergoing chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy. While the aromatase inhibitor appears to be more beneficial than tamoxifen when paired with OFS, further research is needed to determine the most effective antihormonal therapy to combine with OFS in this specific patient population.

Clinical trial identification

HERceptin Adjuvant (HERA) (BIG1-01; NCT00045032).

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.