Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 17

1167P - Outcomes of local and systemic treatment in primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PHNEN)

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 17

Topics

Clinical Research;  Cytotoxic Therapy;  Endocrine Therapy;  Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging;  Surgical Oncology;  Rare Cancers

Tumour Site

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms;  Hepatobiliary Cancers

Presenters

Leonidas Apostolidis

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S749-S761. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1598

Authors

L. Apostolidis1, L. de Mestier du Bourg2, Z. Kender3, V. Flegka3, E.C. Winkler1, S. Krug4, C. Kratochwil5, O. Hentic Dhome2, P. Ruszniewski2, J. Cros6, B. Goeppert7, S. Roessler8

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, 69120 - Heidelberg/DE
  • 2 Gastroenterology - Pancreatology, Beaujon Hospital APHP, 92110 - Clichy/FR
  • 3 Department Of Medicine I: Endocrinology And Clinical Chemistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 - Heidelberg/DE
  • 4 Department Of Gastroenterology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 - Heidelberg/DE
  • 5 Department Of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 - Heidelberg/DE
  • 6 Department Of Pathology, Beaujon Hospital APHP, 92110 - Clichy/FR
  • 7 Institute Of Pathology, RKH Klinikum Ludwigsburg, 71640 - Ludwigsburg/DE
  • 8 Medical Faculty, Institute For Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 - Heidelberg/DE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1167P

Background

Liver involvement in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) most commonly encompasses metastases from other organs or from an unknown primary. However, the current WHO classification defines primary hepatic NEN (PHNEN) arising in the liver as a distinct entity. With only few cases of PHNEN reported and difficulty to discern them from hepatic metastases, evidence on optimal management is very limited.

Methods

Retrospective review of the combined prospective and retrospective databases of two high-volume NEN centers for PHNEN presenting between 08/1996 and 10/2023.

Results

Among over 2500 patients in the databases, 38 patients with PHNEN could be identified. Median follow-up was 40.7 months. Histologies were NET G1 (n=6), NET G2 (n=17), NET G3 (n=3), NEC G3 (n=11) and MiNEN (n=1). Resection of the hepatic primary was performed in 23 patients with a median recurrence-free survival of 115.9 months. 5 patients received liver transplantation, median RFS was 139.1 months. TACE with streptozotocin (STZ) led to a PR in 3 of 4 patients, mostly in multimodal treatment concepts. Monotherapy with a somatostatin analogue (SSA) was administered to 7 evaluable patients, all with stable disease (SD) and a median PFS of 14.0 months. 5 evaluable patients received alkylating-based chemotherapy with a median PFS of 16.5 months and 1 partial remission (PR) under STZ+5-FU. Of 4 evaluable patients under peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), 2 showed a PR, 1 an SD and 1 a mixed response. Other systemic treatments with notable activity included sunitinib (1 PR) and FOLFOX+bevacizumab (1 PR). Platinum-based chemotherapy was applied in 9 NEN G3 patients with only 2 PRs and 1 SD as best responses and the remaining tumors progressing, with a median progression-free survival of 2.5 months. The median overall survival of the whole cohort was 133.9 months, with 4.2 months in NEC G3 and MiNEN vs. 133.9 months in NET G1-3 (p<0.0001).

Conclusions

Both primary tumor resection and liver transplantation can lead to long-time RFS in PHNEN. While STZ-based TACE, SSAs, PRRT and alkylating-based chemotherapy showed encouraging activity in well-differentiated PHNEN, efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in G3 PHNEN was limited. Prognosis was largely determined by grading and differentiation.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Heidelberg University Hospital.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

L. Apostolidis: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ipsen, BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Camurus, Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Member: ENETS, DGEM, DKG, AIO, DGHO. L. de Mestier du Bourg: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Adacap, Ipsen, Esteve, Sirtex, Servier; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Viatris. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.