Abstract 950P
Background
In EMERALD-1 (NCT03778957), D + B + TACE significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs TACE in pts with embolisation-eligible uHCC. The up-to-7 criterion measures tumour burden based on tumour number and diameter, which are prognostic for HCC. Here, outcomes were assessed by baseline tumour burden based on the up-to-7 criterion.
Methods
Pts were randomised 1:1:1 to D + B + TACE, D + TACE or TACE arms. Pts received D (1500 mg) + TACE or PBO for D (Q4W) + TACE. After completing last TACE, pts received D (1120 mg) + B (15 mg/kg), D (1120 mg) + PBO for B or PBOs for D and B (Q3W). PFS and time to progression (TTP) (BICR RECIST 1.1) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and safety in the safety analysis set (SAS; pts received ≥1 dose of study treatment [tx], regardless of randomisation) are reported by baseline tumour burden (within [≤7] or beyond up-to-7 criterion [>7]).
Results
At screening, the >7 group included more pts with ECOG PS1, BCLC Stage C, HAP C or D scores or PVI vs the ≤7 group. Disease characteristics were generally consistent across arms in the ≤7 and >7 groups. PFS improved with D + B + TACE vs TACE in the ≤7 and >7 groups, while PFS improved with D + TACE in the ≤7 group only. Trends were similar for TTP with marked improvement with D + B + TACE vs TACE in the ≤7 and >7 groups, and TTP improvement with D + TACE vs TACE, which was greater in the ≤7 group. Max Grade 3–4 tx-related adverse event (TRAE) frequencies were numerically higher with D + B + TACE vs TACE in the ≤7 and >7 groups; differences were reduced when adjusted for exposure. No tx-related deaths with D + B + TACE were observed. Table: 950P
ITT | Within up-to-7 | Beyond up-to-7 | ||||
D + B + TACE n=97 | D + TACE n=97 | TACE n=102 | D + B + TACE n=106 | D + TACE n=110 | TACE n=103 | |
mPFS, mo (95% CI) | 19.4 (13.9–24.9) | 13.6 (10.0–16.5) | 11.1 (7.0–14.0) | 11.1 (6.7–16.6) | 6.8 (4.8–9.7) | 6.9 (5.2–8.5) |
PFS HR vs TACE (95% CI) | 0.72 (0.51–1.03) | 0.83 (0.58–1.17) | 0.79 (0.57–1.09) | 1.01 (0.74–1.39) | ||
mTTP, mo (95% CI) | 24.9 (19.4–30.2) | 13.6 (11.0–19.2) | 11.1 (7.1–16.6) | 16.7 (12.5–22.3) | 9.2 (6.7–13.7) | 8.2 (6.9–14.1) |
TTP HR vs TACE (95% CI) | 0.59 (0.40–0.87) | 0.80 (0.55–1.15) | 0.64 (0.44–0.93) | 0.95 (0.67–1.35) | ||
SAS | n=82 | n=106 | n=99 | n=72 | n=126 | n=101 |
n (%) Event rate per 100 pt-year | ||||||
Max Grade 3–4 TRAE | 20 (24.4)15.9 | 4 (3.8)3.1 | 9 (9.1)6.5 | 21 (29.2)21.6 | 11 (8.7)11.5 | 3 (3.0)3.4 |
HR, hazard ratio; m, median
Conclusions
In a broad population, PFS and TTP benefits were observed with D + B + TACE vs TACE with manageable safety, regardless of tumour burden. Data further support a favourable risk-benefit profile with D + B + TACE in embolisation-eligible uHCC.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03778957.
Editorial acknowledgement
Medical writing support, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Justine Juana, BHSc, CMC Connect, a division of IPG Health Medical Communications.
Legal entity responsible for the study
AstraZeneca.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
M. Kudo: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eisai, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Takeda, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, Chugai, Eisai, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Otsuka, Taiho, Eisai, AbbVie, GE Healthcare, Chugai. R. Lencioni: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: AstraZeneca. J.P. Erinjeri: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca. S.L. Chan: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Eisai, AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, MSD, Eisai, Roche, Ipsen; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Eisai, MSD. Z. Ren: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche. J. Heo: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultant: GSK. V. Breder: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, payment for lectures: Roche, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Bayer, Novartis. M. Bouattour: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, BMS, Sirtex Medical, Ipsen, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Servier, Taiho; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: MSD, BMS, Sirtex Medical, AstraZeneca. F. Dayyani: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Eisai, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ipsen, Sirtex, Takeda; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: AstraZeneca, BMS, Bayer, Roche, Ipsen, Merck; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Exelixis, Signatera, Taiho. T. Suttichaimongkol: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Takeda (Thailand). T. Decaens: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Bayer, Becton Dickinson, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Roche, Sirtex, Terumo, Guerbet; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AbbVie, Gilead, MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: ArQule, Guerbet, Genoscience Pharma. R. Griffin: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Contracted employee: AstraZeneca. C. Morgan, S.K. Ali, K. Balaji: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. B. Sangro: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, Boston Scientific, Roche, Sirtex; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Sirtex, Eisai, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
962P - Best practices and impact of multi-disciplinary teams on hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: Insights from a global effort
Presenter: Pablo Azcue
Session: Poster session 17
963P - Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis to assess the impact of treatment with camrelizumab + rivoceranib (cam+rivo) on quality of life vs sorafenib (sora) in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): Study CARES-310
Presenter: Andrew Moon
Session: Poster session 17
964P - Lenvatinib (L) and sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): An international, multicenter, phase IV study (STELLAR)
Presenter: Markus Peck Radosavljevic
Session: Poster session 17
967P - Lenvatinib (L) versus sorafenib (S) second-line therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients (P) progressed to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB)
Presenter: Mara Persano
Session: Poster session 17
968P - HAIC combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors versus lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors for advanced HCC with portal vein tumor thrombosis: A prospective controlled trial
Presenter: Xiaodong Wang
Session: Poster session 17
969P - Lenvatinib versus sorafenib as a second-line option in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab: An observational study
Presenter: Pasquale Lombardi
Session: Poster session 17
970P - Comparing clinical outcomes between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors plus bevacizumab combined with hepatic arterial interventional therapies in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center, real-world study
Presenter: Yangxun Pan
Session: Poster session 17
Resources:
Abstract
971P - Chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 may be a potential better alternative optionfor advanced unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective real-world study
Presenter: binghua dai
Session: Poster session 17
972P - Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib vs sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-center real-world study from the LINK Research Network
Presenter: Jung Yong Hong
Session: Poster session 17