Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Symptom management

CN84 - Nursing intervention for self-management of symptoms in people undergoing chemotherapy: Feasibility and acceptability test

Date

15 Sep 2024

Session

Symptom management

Topics

Patient Education and Advocacy;  Therapy

Tumour Site

Presenters

Gloria Mabel Carrillo González

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1197-S1204. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1586

Authors

G.M. Carrillo González, L.R. Corredor Parra, J.E. García Forero

Author affiliations

  • Nursing, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 111321 - Bogota/CO

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract CN84

Background

Chemotherapy is one of the effective treatments provided to people with cancer, however, it generates physical, psychological, emotional and spiritual symptoms that affect the person and their family, causing an alteration in the quality of life. The importance of training people and their families about chemotherapy and the symptoms that may arise, empowers patients to manage symptoms on an outpatient basis, improves decision-making regarding treatment and the disease, and generates adequate communication with the health team facing the evolution and progress of the disease. Objective: to determine the preliminary effects of the nursing intervention for outpatient self-management of symptoms in people undergoing chemotherapy treatment.

Methods

This study used a one-group pretest-posttest design. Potential intervention effects were determined by measuring symptom burden and self-management behaviors. The methodological parameters proposed by Sidani for the systematic evaluation of interventions, consisting of 2 phases. In phase 1, the modeling of the intervention was carried out, which includes the following steps: a. conceptualization of the intervention, b. operationalization of the intervention and its mechanism. And in phase 2: pilot test of the intervention and research methods which aims to determine the acceptability, feasibility and effects of the intervention.

Results

The symptoms that caused the most burden in the participants were diarrhea, mucositis, nausea, and vomiting. Regarding acceptability, 88% of the participants felt satisfied, 96% found the intervention useful.

Conclusions

The application of the intervention generated positive preliminary results regarding the feasibility and acceptability of the Intervention.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The author.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.