Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

EONS Poster Display session

CN103 - Is my patient constipated? How do I assess? Validity and reliability study of the constipation assessment scale in cancer patients: The case of Türkiye

Date

15 Sep 2024

Session

EONS Poster Display session

Presenters

Aslıhan Öztürk Çetin

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1197-S1204. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1586

Authors

A. Öztürk Çetin1, G. Temiz2, O. Altnbas Akkas3, S. Akin Erolu4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology Nursing, University of Bakircay, 35100 - Menemen/TR
  • 2 Oncology Nursing, Health Science University, 34255 - ÜSKÜDAR/TR
  • 3 Nursing, Duzce University, 81620 - Duzce/TR
  • 4 Nursing, Health Science University, 34255 - ÜSKÜDAR/TR

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract CN103

Background

Constipation is a common symptom in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy or opioids. There are no validated and reliable scales to measure constipation as a side effect in Turkey. The aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Constipation Assessment Scale.

Methods

The study is methodological research. The sample included 100 cancer patients in the oncology department of a public hospital who agreed to participate in the study. Data were collected between 1 May and 1 September 2023. The validity and reliability of the scale were assessed in three stages: translation, validity (content and construct validity) and reliability. The scale was translated using the back translation technique. The content validity index was 1.00. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.93. The scale showed a significant difference between the lower and upper groups (p<0.05). The scale was translated using the back translation technique.

Results

The content validity index of the scale was determined as 1.00. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.93. The scale showed a significant difference between the lower and upper groups (p<0.05). The scale made fine distinctions. It was observed that the intraclass correlation coefficient values regarding the agreement between test-retest measurements were high, and there was no difference between test-retest values (p<0.05). It was observed that the fit statistics calculated by confirmatory factor analysis were in acceptable compliance with the predetermined factor structure of the scale. Standardized coefficients show that factor loadings are high. Standard errors were low and t values were significant.

Conclusions

The study concludes that the scale is appropriate for the Turkish population and will be a useful tool for professionals, researchers, and health professionals in future studies.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.