Abstract 130P
Background
Tumor-agnostic application of ipi+nivo has shown effectiveness in various tumor types. TMB, the number of mutations per megabase of tumor genome, and TML, the non-synonymous mutations across the whole tumor genome, are frequently used as biomarkers for patient selection. However, few studies have used TMB/TML in a prospective, tumor-agnostic setting. Here, we present results of ipi+nivo in adult patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic TMB/TML-H cancers.
Methods
Treatment-refractory pts, progressive on last treatment lines, were treated in DRUP (NCT02925234) with off-label drugs, based on their tumors’ molecular profile. Eligible pts had microsatellite stable tumors and a TML of 200-1000 or TMB between 11-24 (Oncomine panel) or 15-39 (TSO500-panel). Pts received 4 cycles of 1mg/kg ipi with 3mg/kg nivo every 3 weeks, followed by 480mg nivo monotherapy every 4 weeks until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Clinical benefit (CB: confirmed objective response (OR) or stable disease (SD) ≥16 weeks) and safety were primary endpoints. A pre-treatment biopsy was taken for post-hoc whole genome sequencing to identify biomarkers associated with CB or PD.
Results
A total of 30 pts started treatment, of whom 24 were evaluable, with 13 different tumor types, mostly colorectal cancer (33%). Median TML was 305 [IQR 238 – 521] and TMB 17 [IQR 13 – 24]. Two pts (8%) had complete response, 6 pts (25%) partial response, and 4 pts (17%) SD, resulting in a CB-rate of 50% (95% CI 29 – 71) and OR-rate of 33% (95% CI 16 – 55). Pts with CB had a significantly higher median TML (526 [IQR 351 – 560] vs. 240 [IQR 225 – 299], p=0.004) and TMB (23 [IQR 17 – 30] vs. 14 [IQR 13 – 17], p=0.005). Median duration of response (mDOR), progression-free and overall survival were 26.7 months (95% CI NA – NA), 5.6 months (95% CI 2.1 – NA) and 31.7 months (95% CI 12.7 – NA), respectively. In 11/30 pts (37%), 16 treatment-related adverse events grade ≥3 were observed, resulting in treatment discontinuation in 4 (13%).
Conclusions
Ipi+nivo showed notable efficacy and impressive mDOR in pts with TMB/TML-H tumors across tumor types. Higher TMB/TML correlated with CB, offering further opportunities to refine patient selection.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02925234.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Funding
Stelvio for Life Foundation: funding; Dutch Cancer Society (KWF): funding; Hartwig Medical Foundation (HMF): genome sequencing; Pharmaceutical partners (Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche): funding and study drugs.
Disclosure
P. Roepman: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Hartwig Medical Foundation. D. Robbrecht: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Merck AG, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Astellas; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Treatmeds, DUOS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, For study purposes: Merck AG; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role: Bayer; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: Sanofi, Incyte, Roche, InteRNA, Numab Therapeutics, Menarini. E.E. Voest: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Hourly rate: Biogeneration Ventures; Financial Interests, Personal, Member of Board of Directors, independent, non-executive director and share holder: Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Founder, strategic adviser and share holder: Mosaic Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest, Mandatory shares as part of board membership: Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest, Start up company with shares: Mosaic Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, DRUP trial: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, GSK, Seattle Genetics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, DRUP trialDRUG Access Protocol: Bayer, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, DRUG Access Protocol: Sanofi; Non-Financial Interests, Other, Supervisory Board: HMF – Hartwig Medical Foundation; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Senior group leader: Oncode Institute; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, Editorial Board: JAMA Oncology. H. Gelderblom: Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Deciphera, Cytovation; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Boehringer Ingelheim, AmMax Bio, Debiopharm, Abbisko. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
133P - Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib in resectable stage III melanoma patients (pts) (NeoPele): Analysis of the peripheral immune profile correlated to pathological response
Presenter: Ines Pires da Silva
Session: Poster session 08
134P - Unraveling functionally distinct metabolic programs to predict immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Arutha Kulasinghe
Session: Poster session 08
135P - Soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) as a predictive biomarker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the first-line setting
Presenter: Adrien Costantini
Session: Poster session 08
136P - Circulating hPG80 (WNT pathway activation) as a potential new prognostic/predictive factor of immunotherapy (ICI) efficacy: ONCOPRO prospective study
Presenter: Benoit You
Session: Poster session 08
137P - Long circulating-free DNA fragments predict early-progression (EP) and progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibition (ICI): A new biomarker
Presenter: Sebastien Salas
Session: Poster session 08
138P - Toward predicting immune checkpoint blockade response in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Integrating tumour and blood characteristics
Presenter: Amelie Franken
Session: Poster session 08
139P - Multimodal prognosis modeling of advanced NSCLC treated with first-line immunochemotherapy: Integrating genomic and microenvironmental data
Presenter: Yi Hu
Session: Poster session 08
140P - Mining metastatic lymph nodes for response to immune checkpoint therapy in non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Elena Donders
Session: Poster session 08
141P - Circulating immune cells predict immunotherapy benefit in patients with triple negative breast cancer: Preliminary results from the IRIS study
Presenter: Benedetta Conte
Session: Poster session 08
142P - Exploring tumor mutational burden and frameshift mutations as predictors of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy
Presenter: Mai Hoshino
Session: Poster session 08