Abstract 1700P
Background
The BIONIKK trial showed promising efficacy of N+/-I and TKI in L1 mRCC according to tumor molecular group. S/R comp. are associated with poor prognosis but conversely may predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We report on the impact of S/R on the efficacy of L1 in the BIONIKK trial.
Methods
Patients (pts) with mRCC were randomized according to ccrcc1-4 molecular group to receive N (58), NI (101) or TKI (40) in L1. Centralized pathological review was performed to identify ISUP grade, to quantify S/R comp. and the immune infiltrate (scale 0 to 3). Endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to S/R. Median follow-up was 46.6 months (IQR: 41.2-54.4).
Results
Of the 199 pts included, S, R and S+R was found in 23 (27.6%), 23 and 32 (co-presence: 58%) tumors respectively. Compared to pts with non-S/R tumors, those with S/R are more often IMDC int+poor (82%/78% vs 63%), have their tumors enriched in ccrcc1+4 (78%/69% vs 50%) and more immune infiltrates (2+3 in 87% vs 57%). Compared with pts without S, S-mRCC pts treated with N tended to have a higher rate of progressive disease (50% vs 34%), a shorter PFS (HR 1.23 [95%CI 0.68-2.22]), and a shorter OS (HR 2.56 [95%CI 1.28-5]), as did pts treated with TKI. Conversely, S-mRCC pts treated with NI had a higher ORR (68% vs. 42%), a longer PFS (HR 0.73 [95%CI 0.43-1.23]), and a similar OS (HR 1.03 [95%CI 0.52-2.04]). Compared with ISUP 4 tumors without S/R, S/R were associated with shorter PFS and OS with N or with TKI, and a higher ORR, PFS and OS with NI (table). Table: 1700P
Nivo | Nivo-ipi | TKI | ||
N= | S/R | 24 | 40 | 14 |
ISUP 4, no S/R | 3 | 13 | 5 | |
ORR (CR+PR) | S/R | 29% | 62% | 50% |
ISUP 4, no S/R | 33% | 8% | 80% | |
mPFS (95%CI), months | S/R | 2.4 (2.3-9.3) | 15.0 (10.3-32.8) | 9.1 (3.4-NA) |
ISUP 4, no S/R | 7.7 (2.16-NA) | 4.8 (2.5-NA) | 35.2 (14.4-NR) | |
HR (95%CI) | 0.78 (0.23-2.7) | 0.31 (0.16-0.62) | 3.44 (0.98-12.5) | |
mOS (95%CI), months | S/R | 21.2 (6.7-34.9) | 47.1 (33.8-NR) | 40.5 (12.9-NR) |
ISUP 4, no S/R | NR (29.4-NR) | 36.8 (29.4-NR) | NR (NR-NR) | |
HR (95%CI) | 4.76 (0.62-33.3) | 0.77 (0.32-1.85) | 4.0 (0.50-33.3) |
Conclusions
Within the BIONIKK study, we confirm the high co-occurrence of S and R comp. in mRCC, as well as a poor prognosis associated with the S comp. We also confirmed the particular efficacy of NI, but not N alone in S-mRCC. Results by ccrcc group, R comp. and %S/R will be presented.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02960906.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
ARTIC (Association pour la Recherche en Thérapeutiques Innovantes en Cancérologie).
Funding
ARTIC, Bristol Myers Squibb.
Disclosure
Y. Vano: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ipsen, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Eisai; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Congress and travel funding: Ipsen, MSD, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, Funding support for the CABIR study: Ipsen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, Funding support for the BIONIKK study: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member, Member of the scientific committee of the WITNESS study: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Tesaro. C. Tournigand: Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role: GERCOR; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role: Fondation APHP. D. Borchiellini: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myer Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Bayer, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Accord HealthCare; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, Clinical Research: Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myer Squibb, Exelixis, Infinity, Janssen, MSD, Roche, Taiho Oncology; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Aveo, Gilead, Seagen. B. Laguerre: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, ASCO GU symposium 2023 (travel and registration): Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, honoraria: Astellas, Janssen, Pfizer, Eisai, Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, registration ASCO virtual meeting 2022: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, registration ASCO GU symposium 2022 (virtual): MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, registration and travel for ASCO meeting 2023: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, registration and travel meeting ASCO GU 2024: Ipsen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, registration virtual meeting EMOS 2023: MSD. P. Barthelemy: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Merck, Pfizer, Ipsen, Bayer, Janssen Cilag, Astellas, Novartis, Amgen, Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca. G. Gravis: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: AAA, AMGEN, Astellas, BMS, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, alliance Merck Pfizer, Bayer, Eisai; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Alliance Merck-Pfizer, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, Ipsen, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, AstraZeneca, AAA Novartis, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Support for attending meetings and/or travel: BMS, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Ipsen, MSD, Pfizer, Janssen, AAA Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: BMS; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: IPSEN, BMS, Merck. S. Oudard: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, consultancy, advisory role: Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, public speaking and advisory role: Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, advisory role and public speaking: AstraZeneca, MSD, Merck, Astellas, Ipsen, Pfizer, Roche, Genentech; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory board and public speaking: BMS, Bayer, Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1636P - Health-related quality of life outcomes of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors versus taxanes versus standard of care in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Results from the ProBio trial
Presenter: Renée Bultijnck
Session: Poster session 11
1637P - Efficacy of talazoparib and enzalutamide in mCRPC patients previously treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) or docetaxel: Post hoc analysis from both cohorts in TALAPRO-2 study
Presenter: Neeraj Agarwal
Session: Poster session 11
1638P - Enzalutamide (enza) with or without leuprolide in patients (pts) with high-risk biochemically recurrent (hrBCR) prostate cancer (PC): EMBARK post hoc analysis by age
Presenter: Neal Shore
Session: Poster session 11
1639P - Self efficacy in people with prostate cancer in the UK: A large, digital survey
Presenter: Joe O'Sullivan
Session: Poster session 11
1640P - Development and validation of a machine learning-based risk model for metastatic disease in nmCRPC patients
Presenter: Ziyun Wang
Session: Poster session 11
1641P - Phase I/II trial of oral masofaniten (EPI-7386) in combination with enzalutamide (Enz) compared to enz alone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) subjects
Presenter: Christos Kyriakopoulos
Session: Poster session 11
1642P - Integrated prognostic score in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with cabazitaxel: A CABASTY posthoc analysis
Presenter: Charles Vauchier
Session: Poster session 11
1643P - Impact of PTEN alterations on clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with de novo metastatic prostate cancer (mPC)
Presenter: Bicky Thapa
Session: Poster session 11
1644P - PSA trajectories and prediction of time to no-longer clinically benefitting in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Insights from the ProBio trial
Presenter: Lana Broer
Session: Poster session 11
1645P - Tumour suppressor gene signature predicts early progression in metastatic hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients
Presenter: Marta Garcia De Herreros
Session: Poster session 11