Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 05

1339P - Impact of KRAS, STK11, and KEAP1 co-mutations on survival outcome and response to chemoimmunotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 05

Topics

Genetic and Genomic Testing;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Utsav Joshi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S802-S877. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1602

Authors

U. Joshi1, S. Gaire2, S.K. Yadav3, P. Budhathoki4, C. Niu5, S.K. Low6, V. Agrawal7, M. Shafique8

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hematology/medical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 33612 - Tampa/US
  • 2 Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, 60608 - Chicago/US
  • 3 Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System - Mankato Hospital, 56001 - Mankato/US
  • 4 Internal Medicine, BronxCare Health System, 10457 - Bronx/US
  • 5 Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, 14621 - Rochester/US
  • 6 Hematology/medical Oncology, Medical college of wisconsin, Wisconsin/US
  • 7 Epidemiology, University of South Florida, 33612 - Tampa/US
  • 8 Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute - Magnolia Campus, 33612 - Tampa/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1339P

Background

Limited retrospective studies have shown benefit of chemo-IO in KRAS mutated metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC), but response in the presence of STK11 or KEAP1 mutations and impact on OS remain unclear.

Methods

Pooled data from AACR GENIE database of mNSCLC patients with documented KRAS, STK11, and KEAP1 mutation status were included. Patients with stage I-III NSCLC who had adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy before disease progression were excluded. KM curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were used to compare OS and evaluate prognostic factors.

Results

A total of 1004 patients were included - KRASwt/ STK11wt/ KEAP1wt (64.7%), KRASmut/ STK11wt/ KEAP1wt (24.1%), KRASmut/ STK11mut or KEAP1 mut (6.5%) and KRASmut/ STK11mut/ KEAP1mut (4.7%). The median age at diagnosis was 62.6, 67, 67.7. and 65.9 years respectively for the four groups. Amongst all patients, 63.7% were females, 67.1% had de novo stage IV disease, 68% had adenocarcinoma, and 18.7% had brain metastases. Patients who had some form of therapy (N=574) included – 63.1% with chemotherapy alone, 4.9% with IO alone, and 32% with chemo-IO. The median OS for the four groups were – 44.2, 46.9, 29.3, and 10.8 months, and 3-year OS were- 59%, 57.2%, 43.2%, and 36.1%, respectively. The table below shows median and 3-year OS of chemo-IO and chemotherapy alone in each group (results for IO alone not included due to very small number). Compared to triple wild type, the presence of KRASmut alone (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.06-1.67, p=0.01), KRASmut with either STK11mut or KEAP1mut (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.18-2.35, p=0.003), and triple mutation (HR 4.08, 95% CI 2.78-5.99, p<0.001) showed worse OS.

Conclusions

STK11 and/or KEAP1 co-mutations with KRAS mutation predicted poor OS, with triple mutated group demonstrating worst OS. KRAS-only mutation or triple mutation derived greater benefit from chemo-IO compared to chemotherapy alone, although small sample size in triple mutated group may limit this conclusion.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors. Table: 1339P

Mutation status Median OS (months) – Chemo + IO Median OS (months) – Chemo only 3- year OS (%) – Chemo + IO 3-year OS (%) – Chemo only
KRAS wt / STK11 wt / KEAP1 wt 29.31 (N=105) 36.5 (N=287) 39.9 51.3
KRAS mut / STK11 wt / KEAP1 wt 34.51 (N=53) 21.6 (N=52) 47.8 26.7
KRAS mut / STK11mut or KEAP1 mut 22.78 (N=14) 23.9 (N=13) 35.7 20.5
KRAS mut / STK11 mut / KEAP1 mut 8.47 (N=12) 5.6(N=10) 8.3 11.1

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

M. Shafique: Other, Personal, Advisory Board: Jazz Pharmaceuticals; Other, Institutional, Research Funding: Vaccinex, Pfizer, Genentech; Other, Personal, Research Funding: Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.