Abstract 1636P
Background
ProBio (NCT03903835) is a biomarker-driven, platform trial in metastatic prostate cancer, evaluating different treatment classes across multiple biomarker signatures against standard-of-care (SOC). Alongside oncological outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a secondary endpoint. Here, we report HRQoL outcomes of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) versus taxanes, SOC in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Methods
Patients with mCRPC underwent genomic analysis before randomization to ARPI, taxanes, or SOC (physician’s choice). EORTC QLQ-C30 HRQoL was measured 3-monthly up to 36 months or disease progression. We modeled HRQoL trajectories using Bayesian joint models, considering informative censoring due to progression. For time to deterioration, defined as 10-point decrement, we estimated cause-specific hazard ratios for different HRQoL domains and symptoms based on Bayesian competing risk models.
Results
A total of 134 patients were randomized to ARPI (N=29), taxanes (N=50) and SOC (N=55). Mean (±standard deviation) global health status scores were balanced across groups with scores of 70 (±19), 72 (±23) and 72 (±25), respectively. Until 6 months, the global health improved in the ARPI group and subsequently declined over time. In contrast, immediate decreases in global health were observed in the taxane and SOC groups. Functional domain declines occurred in all groups and, with the exception for cognitive function, were typically more substantial in the taxane group. Role, social, and emotional functioning were better preserved with ARPI compared to taxanes and SOC. Symptom scales were better in ARPI-treated patients, with lower pain levels, especially at time points beyond 12 months. Most symptoms increased over time in all groups. Furthermore, ARPI was associated with a lower deterioration rate in global health status compared to both taxane (HR 0.3, 95% CI: 0.18-0.5) and SOC (HR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.63).
Conclusions
ARPI-treated mCRPC patients experience an initial improvement in HRQoL and experience overall superior HRQoL compared to those receiving taxanes or SOC.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03903835, EudraCT 2018-002350-78.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
ProBio Consortium.
Funding
Kom op tegen Kanker, Swedish Research Council, Swedish Cancer Society, Janssen, AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1709P - Outcomes with novel combinations in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC): ORACLE study
Presenter: Deepak Kilari
Session: Poster session 11
1710P - Exposure-response (E/R) relationship of nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell clear cell carcinoma (mRCC) from the randomised phase II BIONIKK study
Presenter: Benoit Blanchet
Session: Poster session 11
1711P - Real-word data challenging the treatment paradigm in metastatic renal cancer: Time to separate IMDC intermediate / poor risk groups?
Presenter: John McGrane
Session: Poster session 11
1712P - Real-world efficacy of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab and its practical predictive biomarkers in advanced renal cell carcinoma: First analysis from RENOIR study [KCSG GU22-13]
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster session 11
1713P - A deep learning approach utilizing the electronic health record (EHR) to identify cancer recurrence in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Jue Hou
Session: Poster session 11
1714P - Detection and monitoring of translocation renal cell carcinoma via epigenomic profiling of cell-free DNA
Presenter: Simon Garinet
Session: Poster session 11
1715P - Interim analysis results from a phase II study of adjuvant penpulimab in very high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Xu Zhang
Session: Poster session 11
1716P - Primary resistance to front-line immune-based combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (ARON-1)
Presenter: martina catalano
Session: Poster session 11