Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Proffered Paper session 2: GU, non-prostate

1962O - Health-related quality of life from the CheckMate 901 trial of nivolumab as first-line therapy for unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma

Date

16 Sep 2024

Session

Proffered Paper session 2: GU, non-prostate

Topics

Tumour Site

Urothelial Cancer

Presenters

Jens Bedke

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1135-S1169. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1616

Authors

J. Bedke1, W. Liao2, L. Shi2, S.I. Blum3, M. Patel3, T.B. Powles4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72074 - Tübingen/DE
  • 2 Clinical Outcome Analytics, Evidera, 20814 - Bethesda/US
  • 3 Global Heor, Bristol Myers Squibb, 08648 - Princeton/US
  • 4 Department Of Genitourinary Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, EC1A 7BE - London/GB

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 1962O

Background

In the phase 3 CheckMate 901 trial (NCT03036098), upfront nivolumab (NIVO) plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) followed by NIVO significantly prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival vs GC alone in cisplatin-eligible patients (pts) with untreated unresectable or metastatic UC. Here, we evaluate the effect of NIVO+GC on HRQoL in CheckMate 901.

Methods

Pts completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EQ-5D-5L at wks 1, 4, 10, 12, and 16 (both arms) and at wks 20, 24, and every 12 wks thereafter (NIVO+GC arm only). In a noninferiority analysis, a mixed effect model for repeated measures used data for pts with an evaluable assessment at baseline and ≥ 1 post-baseline assessment to estimate differences in overall least square (LS) mean changes from baseline to wk 16. Descriptive change from baseline based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) (0 vs 1), presence of visceral metastasis, and whether complete or partial response was achieved were also evaluated.

Results

Overall, 276 pts in the NIVO+GC arm and 248 in the GC alone arm were included in the analyses. Baseline scores for the prespecified scales of interest were generally comparable with population norms. Completion rates were above 75% through wk 10, and generally above 60% through wk 24. Overall LS mean changes up to wk 16 showed noninferiority of NIVO+GC vs GC alone on all key scale scores (Table). Change from baseline was similar across both arms in subgroups based on baseline ECOG PS, presence of visceral metastasis, or achievement of response for all evaluated patient-reported outcome domains.

Conclusions

Addition of NIVO to GC had minimal impact on HRQoL vs GC alone. This further supports NIVO+GC as a first-line therapy for cisplatin-eligible pts with unresectable or metastaticUC. Table. Overall LS mean changes to wk 16 (prespecified scales of interest). Table: 1962O

NIVO+GC.LS mean (95% CI) GC.LS mean (95% CI) Difference in LS means (95% CI) Non-inferiority margina
EORTC QLQ-C30
Global health status -0.47 (-2.46 to 1.53) 0.06 (-2.06 to 2.18) -0.53 (-3.05 to 2.00) -4
Physical functioning -2.50 (-4.45 to -0.54) -4.26 (-6.34 to -2.19) 1.77 (-0.71 to 4.24) -5
Role functioning -3.78 (-6.59 to -0.97) -4.53 (-7.46 to -1.59) 0.75 (-2.80 to 4.30) -6
Fatigue 4.67 (2.26–7.08) 5.57 (3.04–8.10) -0.90 (-3.94 to 2.13) +5
EQ-5D-5L
EQ-VAS 1.18 (-0.64 to 2.99) 0.95 (-0.95 to 2.86) 0.22 (-2.05 to 2.49) -7

aLower bound of minimum important difference (Cocks K, et al. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:89-96). CI, confidence interval.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03036098.

Editorial acknowledgement

Medical writing support was provided by Stephen Gilliver, PhD, of Evidera, and editorial assistance was provided by Erika Young, PharmD, of Parexel, funded by Bristol Myers Squibb.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Bristol Myers Squibb.

Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb.

Disclosure

J. Bedke: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Astellas, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, MSD, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, Roche, Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Astellas, BMS, Eisai, MSD, Ipsen, Novartis, Nektar, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen; Other, Member: European Association of Urology. L. Shi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment, Receiving salary from this company: Evidera, Inc; Financial Interests, Institutional, Stocks/Shares, Receiving stocks as an employee: Evidera, Inc. S.I. Blum: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Full-time Employee of Bristol Myers Squibb: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, Stock shareholder of Bristol Myers Squibb: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, Stock shareholder of: GSK. M. Patel: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. T.B. Powles: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Incyte, Ipsen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Merck Serono, Astellas, Johnson & Johnson, Eisai, Roche, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche, Pfizer, MSD, AstraZeneca, Ipsen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Sponsorship for Uromigos Podcast: Mashup Ltd; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, honoraria: Gilead; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Seattle Genetics, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck Serono, Astellas, Johnson & Johnson, Eisai; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Honoraria: Gilead. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.