Abstract 1572P
Background
The determinants of choices of orientation towards medical oncology have been little explored.
Methods
Medical students of the classes 2022 and 2023 in Lille and Amiens Universities (North of France) were enrolled in a quantitative online survey, with 2 follow-up over 2 months. 36 potential determinants from previous works (Wright et al. 2004; Beaulieu et al. 2010) were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale alongside parameters. Choosing oncology was assessed among 44 specialities. We identified determinants using both CHAID method and binary and multiple linear regressions, and CHAID method.
Results
Responders were 563 (563/1250; 45%). CHAID analysis retained 2 factors: “medical oncology traineeship” (p<.0001) and “identification with a doctor in the specialty” (p=.049). when excluding factors associated with énd-cycle trining, CHAID analysis retained 2 factors associated with a career choice in oncology: “rejection of emergency care” (p=.036) and “wish of hospital-university career” (p=.006). Motivations differed according to sexes. In men, choosing oncology was associated in multivariate analysis with: “hospital traineeship in medical oncology” (β=0.22; p=.010), “hospital traineeship in oncology radiotherapy” (β=0.22; p<0.001) and “interest in fundamental research” (β=0.06; p<.001). Conversely, “rural life” (β=-0.09; p=.014) was negatively associated with this choice. In women, parameters positively associated with choosing oncology were: “hospital traineeship in medical oncology” (β=0.289; p<.001), “long-term relationship with patients” (β=0.12; p=.021) and “hospital work” (β=0.21; p=0<.001). A negative association was observed for: “treatment with visible outcome in the short term” (β=-0.15; p=.018) and “rural life” (β=-0.15; p=.006).
Conclusions
Motivations varied according to sexes. Hospital experience during the second cycle of medical studies plays a determining role. The ability or the interest in emergency management seems important in career choice. Certain interests influence career choice (long-term relationship with patient) as well as contextual factors (rural life). These results can be interpreted according to Bandura's social cognitive theory.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Centre Oscar Lambret.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1563P - Increasing the earlier detection of lung cancer: A toolbox for change
Presenter: Helena Wilcox
Session: Poster session 10
1564P - Limited participation in breast cancer screening among low-SES women: A matter of engagement or of health literacy?
Presenter: Allegra Ferrari
Session: Poster session 10
1566P - Optimizing participation in lung cancer screening program: Results from the first round in ILYAD study in Lyon University Hospital
Presenter: Emmanuel Grolleau
Session: Poster session 10
1567P - Physicians' adenoma detection rate and the risk of colorectal cancer in sequential screening programs: An observational cohort study
Presenter: Li Xie
Session: Poster session 10
1568P - Challenges in pilot lung cancer screening in Vojvodina, Serbia
Presenter: Jelena Djekic Malbasa
Session: Poster session 10
1569P - Secondary delay in breast cancer diagnosis and role of rural medical practitioners: A cause and cure finding study
Presenter: Rahul Agarwal
Session: Poster session 10
1570P - Factors and impacts of delayed presentation for county-level patients with breast cancer in a real-life setting in China
Presenter: Yinghua Ji
Session: Poster session 10
1571P - The reasons that motivate a change of specialties among oncology residents
Presenter: Christophe Ducrocq
Session: Poster session 10
1573P - Global cancer statistics for adolescents and young adults: New estimates from GLOBOCAN 2022
Presenter: Wang-Zhong Li
Session: Poster session 10
Resources:
Abstract