Abstract 1572P
Background
The determinants of choices of orientation towards medical oncology have been little explored.
Methods
Medical students of the classes 2022 and 2023 in Lille and Amiens Universities (North of France) were enrolled in a quantitative online survey, with 2 follow-up over 2 months. 36 potential determinants from previous works (Wright et al. 2004; Beaulieu et al. 2010) were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale alongside parameters. Choosing oncology was assessed among 44 specialities. We identified determinants using both CHAID method and binary and multiple linear regressions, and CHAID method.
Results
Responders were 563 (563/1250; 45%). CHAID analysis retained 2 factors: “medical oncology traineeship” (p<.0001) and “identification with a doctor in the specialty” (p=.049). when excluding factors associated with énd-cycle trining, CHAID analysis retained 2 factors associated with a career choice in oncology: “rejection of emergency care” (p=.036) and “wish of hospital-university career” (p=.006). Motivations differed according to sexes. In men, choosing oncology was associated in multivariate analysis with: “hospital traineeship in medical oncology” (β=0.22; p=.010), “hospital traineeship in oncology radiotherapy” (β=0.22; p<0.001) and “interest in fundamental research” (β=0.06; p<.001). Conversely, “rural life” (β=-0.09; p=.014) was negatively associated with this choice. In women, parameters positively associated with choosing oncology were: “hospital traineeship in medical oncology” (β=0.289; p<.001), “long-term relationship with patients” (β=0.12; p=.021) and “hospital work” (β=0.21; p=0<.001). A negative association was observed for: “treatment with visible outcome in the short term” (β=-0.15; p=.018) and “rural life” (β=-0.15; p=.006).
Conclusions
Motivations varied according to sexes. Hospital experience during the second cycle of medical studies plays a determining role. The ability or the interest in emergency management seems important in career choice. Certain interests influence career choice (long-term relationship with patient) as well as contextual factors (rural life). These results can be interpreted according to Bandura's social cognitive theory.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Centre Oscar Lambret.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1607P - Association of the lipid biomarker, PCPro, and clinical outcomes in the ENZAMET trial (ANZUP 1304)
Presenter: Lisa Horvath
Session: Poster session 10
1608P - Prostate cancer working group 4 (PCWG4) preliminary criteria using serial PSMA PET/CT for response evaluation: Analysis from the PRINCE trial
Presenter: Michael Hofman
Session: Poster session 10
1609P - PSMA-PET and PROMISE re-define stage and risk in patients with prostate cancer
Presenter: Wolfgang Fendler
Session: Poster session 10
1610P - Circulating tumour cell (CTC) enumeration and overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with xaluritamig
Presenter: Andrew Armstrong
Session: Poster session 10
1611P - Haematologic impact of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus ARPI change in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in PSMAfore
Presenter: Kim Nguyen Chi
Session: Poster session 10
1612P - Impact of FANCA, ATM, CDK12 alterations on survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: David Lorente
Session: Poster session 10
1613P - Clinically advanced prostate cancer (CAPC) featuring BRCA2 loss: A comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) study
Presenter: Chiara Mercinelli
Session: Poster session 10
1614P - PSA responses and PSMA scan changes after immunotherapy for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR) without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
Presenter: Ravi Madan
Session: Poster session 10
1615P - A new prognostic model of overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC)
Presenter: Susan Halabi
Session: Poster session 10