Abstract 954P
Background
The development of immunotherapy allows improvement of survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, objective responses occur only in a third of patients and the identification of biomarkers to predict therapeutic efficacy remains a major issue. In this setting, we developed an immunological monitoring evaluating the CD8 specific immune responses of selected tumor-shared antigens.
Methods
Twenty patients with advanced HCC treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in a first-line setting were included in the ITHER study (NCT02840058). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed before and after 3 months of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. CD8 specific immune responses of various antigens (telomerase, survivin, NY-ESO-1, mage-A1, mage-A3, and glypican) were evaluated by IFNγ ELISpot assays and correlated with clinical outcomes. Ten healthy donors (HD) were included in a control cohort.
Results
HCC patients had mostly a locally advanced tumor (70.0%) associated with cirrhosis (63.3%) and preserved liver function (88.9% Child-Pugh A). The frequencies of mage-A1, mage-A3, and glypican specific CD8 T-cell responses were higher in HCC patients than in HD (26.3% vs 10.0% for mage-A1, 15.8% vs 10.0% for mage-A3, and 27.8% vs 10.0% for glypican). At baseline, responder HCC patients had a higher frequency of mage-A1 specific CD8 T-cell responses than non-responders (40.0% vs 12.5%, p=0.313). Interestingly, the survivin (63.6% vs 0.0%, p=0.005) and NY-ESO-1 (40.0% vs 0.0%, p=0.092) specific CD8 T-cell responses were only observed in responder HCC patients. After immunotherapy, the frequency of these specific responses was higher in responders compared to non-responder HCC patients in particular for survivn (50.0% vs 11.1%, p=0.141) and only observed in responder HCC patients for mage (33.3% vs 0.0%, p=0.206) and glypican (33.3% vs 0.0%, p=0.206).
Conclusions
The expansion of selected antigen specific CD8 T cells in HCC patients treated by immunotherapy provides the rationale for the immunological monitoring in this setting and deserves further investigation in a larger number of patients.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02840058.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1427P - Predicting overall survival and prognostic indicator genes in esophagogastric cancer patients using machine learning and bioinformatics analysis
Presenter: Nguyen-Kieu Viet-Nhi
Session: Poster session 17
1428P - Total neoadjuvant FLOT chemotherapy in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma: An international cohort study
Presenter: Hollie Clements
Session: Poster session 17
1429P - Differences in esophageal cancer incidence and survival by race/ethnicity: A SEER analysis
Presenter: Ashwin Kulshrestha
Session: Poster session 17
1430P - Impact of menadione supplementation in the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer: A randomized phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Francisco Cezar Moraes
Session: Poster session 17
1431P - Assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A deep learning approach with voxel-level radiomics
Presenter: Yongling Ji
Session: Poster session 17
1432P - Safety of laparoscopic D2 distal gastrectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer patients: A prospective multicenter trial (CLASS-03a)
Presenter: Kun Yang
Session: Poster session 17