Abstract 1619P
Background
Limited randomised data in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have demonstrated moderate effects of platinum-based chemotherapy. Retrospective analyses have suggested DNA repair deficiency (DRD) to be associated with improved platinum responses and survival outcomes. We compared the efficacy of carboplatin to physician’s choice of standard-of-care (SOC) in patients with mCRPC in the Prostate Biomarker (ProBio) trial platform.
Methods
Patients with mCRPC underwent circulating tumour DNA analysis before randomization. Men with either DRD or TP53 mutation were assigned to the investigational carboplatin or SOC control arm. Here, we compared progression-free survival (PFS) (evaluated by no longer clinically benefiting per PCWG3 criteria) as primary endpoint, and overall survival (OS).
Results
In total, 115 men were randomised, i.e. 72 to SOC and 43 to carboplatin, whereof 104/115 (90%) patients were initiating first or second line systemic therapy for mCRPC. Clinical characteristics and treatment history were similar between groups. A TP53 mutation was found in 24/43 (56%) carboplatin- and 39/72 (54%) SOC-treated patients. In the carboplatin arm 17/43 (40%) patients had DRD, with 8/43 (19%) being BRCA1/2-altered. In the SOC arm, DRD was detected in 16/72 (22%) patients, with 8/72 (11%) being BRCA1/2-altered. Carboplatin reached the prespecified threshold of futility. The Survival Time Ratio (STR) for PFS for carboplatin was 0.65 (90% credible Intervals (CI) 0.51, 0.82) compared with SOC, resulting in a median estimated PFS of 4.4 months (90% CI, 3.7, 5.3) for carboplatin versus 6.8 months (90% CI, 6.0, 7.9) for SOC arm. PFS for carboplatin remained inferior in DRD (STR 0.68, 90% CI 0.45-1.07) and TP53-altered (STR 0.76, 90% CI 0.57-1.05) subgroup analyses. The median estimated OS was 17.2 months (90% CI, 14.6-21.3) for carboplatin compared with 19.3 (90% CI, 16.8-23.2) for SOC.
Conclusions
Carboplatin is not favourable as compared to SOC in patients with mCRPC harboring DRD/TP53 mutations.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03903835, EudraCT 2018-002350-78.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Karolinska Institutet.
Funding
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca (Swedish Research Council, Swedish Cancer Society, Kom op tegen Kanker).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1627P - Long survivors after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): Long-term follow-up of GETUG-15
Presenter: Sarah Blanchet-Deverly
Session: Poster session 11
1628P - Factors influencing clinical and biological response in patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 under France's early access program
Presenter: Vincent Habouzit
Session: Poster session 11
1629P - Lutetium-177–prostate-specific membrane antigen (177Lu-PSMA) therapy in patients (pts) with prior Radium-223 (223Ra)
Presenter: Kambiz Rahbar
Session: Poster session 11
1630P - A multicenter retrospective study on the efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 in microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Sandra Van Wilpe
Session: Poster session 11
1632P - Impact of androgen pathway inhibitors on cognitive function in elderly patients with metastatic prostate cancer: Results from the COG-PRO trial
Presenter: Antoine Boué
Session: Poster session 11
1634P - Does lower serum testosterone predict metastases-free survival in nmCRPC patients treated with novel antiandrogens? A post-hoc analysis of SPARTAN and ARAMIS
Presenter: Xudong Ni
Session: Poster session 11
1635P - Validation of automated bone scan index as a progression endpoint in two phase III studies of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients
Presenter: Andrea Knezevic
Session: Poster session 11
1636P - Health-related quality of life outcomes of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors versus taxanes versus standard of care in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Results from the ProBio trial
Presenter: Renée Bultijnck
Session: Poster session 11