Abstract 1619P
Background
Limited randomised data in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have demonstrated moderate effects of platinum-based chemotherapy. Retrospective analyses have suggested DNA repair deficiency (DRD) to be associated with improved platinum responses and survival outcomes. We compared the efficacy of carboplatin to physician’s choice of standard-of-care (SOC) in patients with mCRPC in the Prostate Biomarker (ProBio) trial platform.
Methods
Patients with mCRPC underwent circulating tumour DNA analysis before randomization. Men with either DRD or TP53 mutation were assigned to the investigational carboplatin or SOC control arm. Here, we compared progression-free survival (PFS) (evaluated by no longer clinically benefiting per PCWG3 criteria) as primary endpoint, and overall survival (OS).
Results
In total, 115 men were randomised, i.e. 72 to SOC and 43 to carboplatin, whereof 104/115 (90%) patients were initiating first or second line systemic therapy for mCRPC. Clinical characteristics and treatment history were similar between groups. A TP53 mutation was found in 24/43 (56%) carboplatin- and 39/72 (54%) SOC-treated patients. In the carboplatin arm 17/43 (40%) patients had DRD, with 8/43 (19%) being BRCA1/2-altered. In the SOC arm, DRD was detected in 16/72 (22%) patients, with 8/72 (11%) being BRCA1/2-altered. Carboplatin reached the prespecified threshold of futility. The Survival Time Ratio (STR) for PFS for carboplatin was 0.65 (90% credible Intervals (CI) 0.51, 0.82) compared with SOC, resulting in a median estimated PFS of 4.4 months (90% CI, 3.7, 5.3) for carboplatin versus 6.8 months (90% CI, 6.0, 7.9) for SOC arm. PFS for carboplatin remained inferior in DRD (STR 0.68, 90% CI 0.45-1.07) and TP53-altered (STR 0.76, 90% CI 0.57-1.05) subgroup analyses. The median estimated OS was 17.2 months (90% CI, 14.6-21.3) for carboplatin compared with 19.3 (90% CI, 16.8-23.2) for SOC.
Conclusions
Carboplatin is not favourable as compared to SOC in patients with mCRPC harboring DRD/TP53 mutations.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03903835, EudraCT 2018-002350-78.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Karolinska Institutet.
Funding
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca (Swedish Research Council, Swedish Cancer Society, Kom op tegen Kanker).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1709P - Outcomes with novel combinations in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC): ORACLE study
Presenter: Deepak Kilari
Session: Poster session 11
1710P - Exposure-response (E/R) relationship of nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell clear cell carcinoma (mRCC) from the randomised phase II BIONIKK study
Presenter: Benoit Blanchet
Session: Poster session 11
1711P - Real-word data challenging the treatment paradigm in metastatic renal cancer: Time to separate IMDC intermediate / poor risk groups?
Presenter: John McGrane
Session: Poster session 11
1712P - Real-world efficacy of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab and its practical predictive biomarkers in advanced renal cell carcinoma: First analysis from RENOIR study [KCSG GU22-13]
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster session 11
1713P - A deep learning approach utilizing the electronic health record (EHR) to identify cancer recurrence in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Jue Hou
Session: Poster session 11
1714P - Detection and monitoring of translocation renal cell carcinoma via epigenomic profiling of cell-free DNA
Presenter: Simon Garinet
Session: Poster session 11
1715P - Interim analysis results from a phase II study of adjuvant penpulimab in very high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Xu Zhang
Session: Poster session 11
1716P - Primary resistance to front-line immune-based combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (ARON-1)
Presenter: martina catalano
Session: Poster session 11