Abstract 45P
Background
Following the TOPAZ-1 study, D + gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) emerged as a standard therapy for aBTC. However, gem-based chemotherapy other than GC is also commonly used in Chinese clinical practice. Our study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of D combined with other gem-based chemotherapy in aBTC and D plus GC in aBTC with ECOG PS 2. Here, we present the interim analysis (IA) outcomes.
Methods
Pts with aBTC will be treated with D plus an investigator-selected gem-based chemotherapy [(gemcitabine + oxaliplatin (GEMOX), gemcitabine + S1 (GS), GC (only for ECOG PS 2 pts)]. The primary endpoint is incidence of grade 3 or 4 possibly related adverse event (G3/4 PRAE) within 6 months after the initiation of combined therapy. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate. Exploratory endpoints will include genomic analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue using the Geneseeq Prime® panel to investigate China-specific BTC genetic alterations, mechanisms of resistance to treatment and identify putative biomarkers of prognosis.
Results
At data cutoff Jan 20, 2024, 112 pts were enrolled in the study (GEMOX, n=45; GS, n=49; GC, n=18). Median follow-up was 3.02m (GEMOX: 2.86m, GS: 3.75m, GC: 1.66m). G3/4 PRAE within 6 months after the initiation of combined therapy occurred in 52 (46.4%) pts, which is 40.0%, 57.1%, and 33.3% in the GEMOX, GS, and GC groups, respectively. The most common G3/4 PRAE were neutrophil count decreased (15.2%), white blood cell count decreased (11.6%) and anaemia (10.7%). Serious adverse event (SAE) occurred in 27.7% pts. Immune-mediate adverse events (imAEs) were reported in 22.3% of pts. A total of 102 pts were included in exploratory analysis, TP53 (53.9%), KRAS (24.5%), ARID1A (19.6%), CDKN2A (18.6%), TERT (18.6%), SMAD4 (15.7%) were the most frequently altered genes.
Conclusions
The IA analysis showed D plus gem-based chemotherapy was consistent with the safety profiles of the TOPAZ-1 study. No new safety signals emerged. Efficacy data and updated exploratory data will be presented in the future.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05924880.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
AstraZeneca.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2019P - Disparities in urothelial carcinoma (UC) drug approval: Contrasting North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 13
2020TiP - SOGUG-NEOWIN: A phase II, open-label, multi-centre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib (ERDA) monotherapy and ERDA and cetrelimab (CET) as neoadjuvant treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and FGFR gene alterations
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster session 13
2022TiP - Stereotactic treatment with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and enfortumab vedotin: A phase I/II study for localized, cisplatin ineligible, muscle invasive bladder cancer (STAR-EV)
Presenter: Tian Zhang
Session: Poster session 13
2024TiP - NETOS: A personalized approach of neoadjuvant therapy, including INCB099280 monotherapy and bladder preservation, for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC) with ctDNA monitoring
Presenter: Valentina Tateo
Session: Poster session 13