Abstract 1383P
Background
Around 60% of NSCLC patients in China have actionable genetic variants, with detection rates influenced by various factors such as diagnostic methods, sample types, and disease stage. Yet, a comparative study on mutation frequency across sample types in Chinese NSCLC patients is lacking.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 5,183 NSCLC patients tested for actionable targets at the Beijing Cancer Hospital and Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between 2018 and 2023. This cohort included 5,051 patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and 132 patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). For LUAD, the samples comprised 3,130 surgical resections, 1,633 biopsies, and 288 pleural effusions. In LUSC, 30 surgical resections and 102 biopsies were analyzed. All samples underwent PCR testing (Amoydx, Xiamen) for nine actionable targets (EGFR, ALK, MET EX14, BRAF, HER2, ROS1, HER2, RET, KRAS).
Results
The positivity rates for each actionable target in adenocarcinoma are presented in the table. EGFR mutations were significantly higher in surgical samples compared to biopsy and pleural effusion samples (p<0.05). ALK fusions had a higher positivity rate in pleural effusion samples compared to biopsy and surgical samples (p<0.05). KRAS mutations were significantly more frequent in biopsy samples compared to surgical and pleural effusion samples (p<0.05). The mutation frequencies of the other eight gene variants besides EGFR in pleural effusion, biopsy, and surgical samples were 20.38%, 23.64%, and 21.88% respectively, with no significant differences observed. Additionally, 12% of the squamous cell carcinoma patients harbored actionable targets (Table).
Conclusions
Overall, 79.17%-86.81% of patients with LUAD carry actionable variations, and notably, there are still 10%-12.7% of patients with LUSC who carry actionable variations. EGFR mutations are more common in surgical samples, possibly due to early-stage disease detection. Table: 1383P
LUAD N=5051 | LUSC N=132 | ||||
Pleural effusion (%)N=288 | Biopsy (%)N=1633 | Surgical (%)N=3130 | Biopsy (%)N=30 | Surgical (%)N=102 | |
EGFR | 57.29 | 56.77 | 66.42 | 3.33 | 4.90 |
KRAS | 4.17 | 10.10 | 7.92 | 0.00 | 1.96 |
BRAF | 2.08 | 1.29 | 1.09 | 3.33 | 0.00 |
ALK | 7.64 | 5.45 | 3.64 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
ROS1 | 1.04 | 1.90 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 2.94 |
MET | 1.04 | 1.29 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
HER2 | 3.13 | 2.57 | 2.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
NRAS | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 3.33 | 0.98 |
RET | 2.78 | 0.86 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1382P - Vebreltinib efficacy and safety in NSCLC patients with METex14 skipping mutations
Presenter: Maurice Pérol
Session: Poster session 06
1384P - Efficacy of cemiplimab as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)
Presenter: Yuki Sato
Session: Poster session 06
1385P - Uncovering resistance mechanisms and vulnerabilities of KEAP1 mutated lung adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Mariana Mancini
Session: Poster session 06
1386P - Prognostic value of EGFR A859S alteration in advanced NSCLC patients treated with third-generation EGFR-TKI
Presenter: Wei Xin Zhao
Session: Poster session 06
1387P - Real-world data, tolerability and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with sotorasib in the UK
Presenter: Rubab Batool
Session: Poster session 06
1388P - Molecular testing in patients with advanced NSCLC from 2016-23 (Prospective German Registry CRISP, AIO-TRK-0315)
Presenter: Frank Griesinger
Session: Poster session 06
Resources:
Abstract
1389P - Safety and effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with lung cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease
Presenter: Siddhartha Goutam
Session: Poster session 06
1390P - Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with thoracic SMARCA4-deficient tumour
Presenter: Inès Duparc
Session: Poster session 06