Abstract 415P
Background
Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive form of BC. Biomarkers to improve risk assessment represent an unmet need. Given the scarcity of liquid biopsy (LB) studies focusing on IBC, our aim was to provide a multi-analyte LB characterization of IBC to dissect its biology and prognosis.
Methods
This study analyzed 341 metastatic BC patients (pts) enrolled in the NU16B06 trial at Northwestern University (2016-2021). Baseline blood samples were processed with the CellSearch® system to enumerate circulating tumor cells (CTCs), HER2+ CTCs, CTCs clusters, cytokeratin+/CD45+ cells (dual-positive, DPs), and tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (tdEVs)–using the ACCEPT software. ctDNA was analyzed with the Guardant360 NGS assay. Differences in LB analytes and their association with overall survival (OS) were compared between the IBC and non-IBC subgroups.
Results
Of the 341 enrolled pts, IBC was diagnosed in 83 pts (24%). Compared to non-IBC, IBC were more frequently HER2+ or TNBC. The Table shows the differences in the distribution of circulating cellular analytes and ctDNA. CTCs, HER2+ CTCs, and tdEVs were significantly associated with OS irrespective of the IBC status. Only in IBC, DPs were significantly associated with OS (HR 2.48) and a trend for shorter OS was observed based on CTC clusters. MYC (HR 4.53) and PIK3CA (HR 3.33) gene alterations had an impact on OS for IBC, while ARID1A (HR 2.07), TP53 (HR 7.33), PIK3CA (HR 2.73), MYC (HR 3.32), CCND2 (HR 3.27) and CCND1 (HR 3.79) alterations showed an impact for non-IBC. Regarding pathways, Cell Cycle (HR 3.29) and MYC (HR 3.33) alterations showed a negative prognostic role for IBC while alterations in P53 (HR 2.08), RAS (HR 2.43), PI3K (HR 2.73), Cell Cycle (HR 2.51), and MYC (HR 3.32) pathways had an impact for non-IBC. Table: 415P
IBC | Non-IBC | P value | |
CTCs | |||
Median (IQR) | 2 (1-8) | 3 (1-15) | 0.337 |
< 5 | 52 (63%) | 157 (61%) | 0.770 |
≥ 5 | 31 (37%) | 101 (39%) | |
HER2+ CTCs | |||
Median (IQR) | 0 (0-2) | 1 (0-8) | 0.005 |
< 1 | 47 (57%) | 105 (41%) | 0.003 |
≥ 1 | 25 (30%) | 128 (50%) | |
NA | 11 (13%) | 25 (9%) | |
CTCs Clusters | |||
Median (IQR) Mean | 0 (0-1) 1.95 | 0 (0-0) 2.57 | 0.19 |
tdEV | |||
Median (IQR) | 10 (3-47) | 22 (4-136) | 0.046 |
0-19 | 46 (55%) | 120 (47%) | 0.265 |
20-79 | 19 (23%) | 60 (23%) | |
≥ 80 | 18 (22%) | 78 (30%) | |
DPs | |||
Median (IQR) | 0.5 (0-2) | 0 (0-1) | 0.358 |
< 1 | 39 (48%) | 123 (55%) | 0.523 |
≥ 1 | 39 (48%) | 91 (41%) | |
NA | 3 (4%) | 8 (4%) | |
PIK3CA SNVs | |||
Wild type | 51 (84%) | 70 (63%) | 0.005 |
Mutant | 10 (16%) | 41 (37%) | |
PI3K pathway SNVs | |||
Wild type | 45 (73%) | 63 (57%) | 0.032 |
Mutant | 16 (27%) | 48 (48%) | |
RTK pathway SNVs | |||
Wild type | 60 (98%) | 99 (89%) | 0.034 |
Mutant | 1 (2%) | 12 (11%) |
Conclusions
Although preliminary, integration of diverse circulating biomarkers showed the potential to refine prognosis, inform clinical decisions, and deepen our understanding of the biology of the IBC subtype.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
American Italian Cancer Foundation.
Disclosure
L. Gerratana: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Lilly, Novartis, Astrazeneca,GSK, Incyte. P. D'Amico: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Merck. A.A. Davis: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Biotheranostics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Breast Cancer Alliance; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Natera, TopAlliance Biociences, AstraZeneca, Antegene Biologics, Roche, Pfizer, Abbvie. H. Liu: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other: ExoMira Medicine. W.J. Gradishar: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Astrazeneca, Roche, Novartis, Lilly; Financial Interests, Local PI: Gilead. G. Curigliano: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Pfizer, Veracyte, BMS, Merck, Exact Sciences, Celcuity; Financial Interests, Personal, Writing Engagement: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory Board: Menarini, Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Advisory Board: Ellipsis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Investigator Initiated Trial: Merck; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, Phase I studies: BMS, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Roche, Blueprint Medicine, Kymab, Astellas, Sanofi, Philogen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, Phase I clinical basket trial: Relay Therapeutics; Non-Financial Interests, Officer, Italian National Health Council as Advisor for Ministry of Health: Consiglio Superiore di Sanità; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, Member of the Scientific Council. Patient advocacy association: Europa Donna; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, Cancer Research Foundation: Fondazione Beretta; Non-Financial Interests, Officer, Editor of Chief of ESMO Open: ESMO; Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, Until the end of 2024: EUSOMA. M. Cristofanilli: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Lilly, Menarini, Olaris, AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo, Syantra, Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Celcuity; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding: Lilly, Angle, Merck, AstraZeneca, Menarini Silicon Biosystems. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
533P - First-line treatment in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A large real-world study
Presenter: debora basile
Session: Poster session 15
534P - Second-line treatment in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: The ELECTRA study
Presenter: Alessia Cordua
Session: Poster session 15
535P - Safety and efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly colorectal cancer patients: An Italian real-world multicenter experience
Presenter: Alessandra Boccaccino
Session: Poster session 15
536P - A randomized phase II/III trial comparing hepatectomy followed by mFOLFOX6 with hepatectomy alone for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: Long-term results of JCOG0603
Presenter: Yukihide Kanemitsu
Session: Poster session 15
537P - Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated findings from a single-arm, prospective phase II trial (RIFLE)
Presenter: Yajiie Chen
Session: Poster session 15
538P - Combined hepatectomy with complete cytoreduction (CCS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) vs. HIPEC alone for metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Gabriele Lech
Session: Poster session 15
540P - Early treatment discontinuation (ETD) in dMMR/MSI-H metastastic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)
Presenter: Julien Taieb
Session: Poster session 15
541P - Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) vs chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment for microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Subgroup efficacy and expanded safety analyses from CheckMate 8HW
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster session 15