Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 02

888P - Comparing paclitaxel plus cisplatin versus cisplatin in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage IV locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A phase II randomized trial

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 02

Topics

Cancer Research

Tumour Site

Head and Neck Cancers

Presenters

Ling Guo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S613-S655. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1594

Authors

L. Guo1, Z. Lu2, Q. Yang3, Q.Y. Chen1, Z. Yang4, L.Q. Tang1, H. Mai3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060 - Guangzhou/CN
  • 2 Department Of Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 510060 - Guangzhou/CN
  • 3 Department Of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 510060 - Guangzhou/CN
  • 4 Department Of Nuclear Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 510060 - Guangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 888P

Background

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin (DDP) is the backbone for locoregionally advanced NPC (LA-NPC). However, patients with IV LA-NPC had a high risk of recurrence and metastasis. Concurrent DDP chemotherapy may be inadequate. Paclitaxel combined with platinum (TP) has yielded satisfactory results in many cancers. We performed a randomized, open-label Phase II trial to prove that the TP-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimen was superior to the DDP-based regimen for high-risk NPC.

Methods

Patients with stage IV LA-NPC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive concurrent TP- or DDP-based chemoradiotherapy. The patients in the TP group were treated with paclitaxel with cisplatin every 4 weeks for two cycles. The patients in the DDP group were treated with cisplatin every 3 weeks for three cycles. The radiotherapy dose was 68-70 Gy delivered in 30-33 fractions. Primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population.

Results

Between February 2017 and September 2019, 184 patients were enrolled, with 92 patients in each arm. After a median follow-up of 47.6 months, estimated 3-year PFS rates were 68.2% in the TP group (95% CI 58.6–77.8) and 72.8% (95% CI 63.8–81.8) in the DDP group (stratified HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71–1.90; P log-rank = 0.56). The two groups showed no differences in terms of PFS, OS, or cumulative incidence of locoregional relapse and distant metastasis. Significantly higher incidence rates of any grade gastrointestinal toxicity (including nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and constipation) and any grade of thrombocytopenia were observed in the DDP group compared to TP group (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in grade 3-4 acute toxicities and any grade or grade 3–4 late toxicities.

Conclusions

The TP regimen did not significantly prolong the PFS compared with the standard DDP regimen in CCRT in patients with stage IV LA-NPC. DDP regimen remains the backbone for CCRT.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03047265, February 2017.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

L. Guo.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.