Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 12

1849P - Clinical predictors of long-term responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in a multi-tumor cohort

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 12

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Melanoma;  Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Víctor Albarrán Fernández

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1077-S1114. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1612

Authors

V. Albarrán Fernández, P. Guerrero, C. Gonzalez Merino, C. García de Quevedo Suero, J. Chamorro-Perez, D.I. Rosero Rodriguez, A.M. Barrill Corpa, P. Sotoca-Rubio, V. Alia Navarro, P. Pérez de Aguado, J.C. Calvo, J. Moreno, M.V. San Roman Gil, P. Alvarez Ballesteros, A. Cortes Salgado, M.E. Olmedo Garcia, A. Gomez Rueda, P. Garrido Lopez, A. Soria Rivas, P. Gajate

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, 28031 - Madrid/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1849P

Background

Long-term responses to ICI are observed in various solid cancers. While extensive research has been conducted to identify molecular biomarkers, additional efforts are needed to optimize patient selection in clinical practice.

Methods

Real-world study of patients (pts) treated with ICI in a tertiary hospital (2015-2022). Pts with progression-free survival (PFS) >24 months (m) were selected. Baseline clinical features, exposure to steroids (ST), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were analyzed.

Results

We evaluated 475 pts (median age: 67.5) with advanced solid tumors (NSCLC: 34.5%; urothelial: 17.3%; renal: 13.7%; melanoma: 11.2%; HNSCC: 10.7%; others: 12.6%). 84.8% received anti-PD1/PDL1, 13.3% anti-PD1+anti-CTLA4, and 1.9% anti-CTLA4 (42.1% in 1st, 43.2% in 2nd, 14.8% in further lines). 71 pts (14.9%) had a PFS >24 m, most of them (69%) having discontinued ICI (26.5% due to irAEs) after a median follow-up of 42.9 m. Median duration of ICI was 21.3 m. Only 15 pts (21.4%) developed PD after 24 m. Among pts with PFS >24 m, there was a higher proportion of baseline ECOG PS = 0 (53.5% vs 27%, p<0.01), autoimmune disorders (9.9% vs 5.9%, p=0.22), and exclusive lymph node metastases (mets) (22.5% vs 12.9%, p=0.03), contrary to liver (18.3% vs 26.5%) and bone (21.1% vs 29.1%) mets. Brain and lung mets were similar in both groups. 54.9% of pts with PFS >24 m received ICI in the 1st line (vs 39.9%, p=0.017). Best responses for pts with PFS >24 m (vs <24 m) were: CR (33.8% vs 1.2%), PR (53.5% vs 22.5%), and SD (11.3% vs 14.4%) (p<0.01). IrAEs were more frequent in pts with PFS >24 m (54.9% vs 29.5%, p<0.0001), and this group was more exposed to ST for irAEs (38% vs 17.6%). Late exposure to ST (>6 m of ICI) prevailed in pts with PFS >24 m (54.9% vs 35%, p<0.01), contrary to ST within 30 days (11.3% vs 26.5%, p<0.01) and 3 m after ICI initiation (16.9% vs 35.4%, p<0.01).

Conclusions

Our results from a multi-tumor cohort suggest that a baseline PS = 0, using ICI in the 1st line setting, exclusive lymph node metastases, CR/PR as best response, and occurrence of irAEs are significantly correlated with a PFS >24 months. The early use of ST is negatively associated with PFS >24 m, contrary to the late exposure to ST and the use of ST for the management of immune-related toxicity.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

A. Cortes Salgado: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, PharmaMar, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Eisai, Accord Healthcare. P. Garrido Lopez: Financial Interests, Advisory Board: Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Medscape, Takeda, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi. P. Gajate: Financial Interests, Advisory Board: BMS, Roche, Pfizer, Ipsen, MSD, Merck, Jannsen, Astellas, Eisai, Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.