Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 16

552P - Baseline imaging biomarkers to predict outcomes in locally advanced colon cancer (LACC): Data from the FOxTROT international randomised-controlled trial

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 16

Topics

Radiological Imaging;  Translational Research

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

James Platt

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S428-S481. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1588

Authors

J.R. Platt1, F. Elliott2, P. Quirke3, N. West3, M.T. Seymour1, L. Magill4, K. Handley4, D. Morton5, D. Tolan6, J. Seligmann1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division Of Oncology, Leeds Institute Of Medical Research, UL - University of Leeds, LS2 9JT - Leeds/GB
  • 2 Division Of Haematology And Immunology, Leeds Institute Of Medical Research, UL - University of Leeds, LS2 9JT - Leeds/GB
  • 3 Division Of Pathology And Data Analytics, Leeds Institute Of Medical Research, UL - University of Leeds, LS2 9JT - Leeds/GB
  • 4 Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham/GB
  • 5 Institute Of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham/GB
  • 6 Department Of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 552P

Background

Increasingly, neoadjuvant treatments are being considered for patients with LACC. Baseline computed tomography (CT) is used to select high-risk patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), but unlike histopathological biomarkers, the prognostic value of data derived from CT scans is unclear. Here, we analysed baseline CT data from the FOxTROT trial to identify imaging biomarkers that can aid selection of high-risk patients.

Methods

In FOxTROT, patients with LACC were randomised 2:1 to NAC or straight-to-surgery (STS), with both groups receiving postoperative chemotherapy. NAC was associated with a significant reduction in long-term recurrence. In this analysis, the following baseline CT features were assessed for associations with time to recurrence: tumour side (right or left), primary tumour (T) stage (T3 or T4), maximum extramural tumour extension (mm), maximum tumour thickness (mm), lymph node (N) stage (N0, N1 or N2), the presence of a lymph node ≥10mm in short axis (yes or no) and the presence of extramural venous invasion (EMVI; yes or no). Data from NAC and STS patients were co-analysed using univariable and multivariable Cox models to assess prognostic biomarkers. Outcomes by treatment arm were explored to identify potential predictive biomarkers.

Results

1,052 patients were included, 698 randomised to NAC and 354 to STS. Recurrence risk was significantly higher with T4 radiological stage (P=0.001), greater extramural tumour extension (P<0.001), greater tumour thickness (P=0.001), a lymph node ≥10mm in short axis (P=0.01) and EMVI (P=0.02). Distance beyond the muscularis propria was the strongest predictor on multivariable analysis (P=0.05). A lymph node ≥10mm in short axis and EMVI showed differential effects with greater impact in NAC than STS, indicating potential as predictive biomarkers.

Conclusions

Several features on baseline CT are associated with recurrence risk in LACC and represent important biomarkers to guide the selection of high-risk patients for NAC and surveillance strategies. The integration of imaging data within multi-modal assessment should be prioritised to optimise patient selection for NAC.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

University of Birmingham.

Funding

Yorkshire Cancer Research.

Disclosure

N. West: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Amgen, Astellas, BMS, GSK, Pfizer. D. Tolan: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: GSK. J. Seligmann: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, CME activities: GI Connect; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, Servier, tacked, GSK; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pierre Fabre, Seagan, Ventana, Zentalis, AstraZeneca, Elevate Oncology, Merck Serono, Takeda, GSK, sanofi; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Research Funding: Pierre Fabre Medicament; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, REview of guidelines, consultancy: Roche Diagnostics; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel: Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.