Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 03

917P - Automatic characterization of spatial arrangement of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes identifies oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients with poorer prognosis

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 03

Topics

Cancer Intelligence (eHealth, Telehealth Technology, BIG Data);  Cancer Research

Tumour Site

Head and Neck Cancers

Presenters

German Corredor

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S613-S655. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1594

Authors

P. Toro1, T. Pathak2, K. Pandav2, J. Lewis3, A. Madabhushi2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Pathology Department, Cleveland Clinic Main Campus, 44195 - Cleveland/US
  • 2 Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, 30322 - Atlanta/US
  • 3 Laboratory Medicine And Pathology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, 85054 - Phoenix/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 917P

Background

Patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) are at high risk of death within 5 years of treatment. Previous works have demonstrated that spatial arrangement of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and surrounding nuclei (e.g, cancer nuclei, macrophages, fibroblasts) is prognostic of overall survival (OS) in different types of cancer, including oropharyngeal and laryngeal. In this work, we evaluated the prognostic ability of a computerized strategy that characterizes the spatial arrangement of TILs & non-TILs on digitized H&E-stained slides of patients with OCSCC.

Methods

Whole slide images (WSIs) from a cohort of 283 patients with OCSCC were retrospectively collected from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, D1). Additionally, WSIs from 136 patients with OCSCC were obtained from Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC, D2). D1 was used to train a prognostic model while D2 was used for independent validation. Computer algorithms automatically identified 2 types of nuclei (TILs & non-TILs) and built clusters for each nucleus type based on proximity. Metrics related to density, intersection, and neighborhood were computed from these clusters. A proportional hazard Cox regression model, regularized via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, was trained to predict risk of death. The percentile 66 risk score on D1 was used as a threshold for stratifying patients on D2 as either low or high risk. Survival analysis was then used to evaluate the association with OS.

Results

Patients in D2 defined as “low risk” (57%) based on spatial arrangement of TILs has significantly better OS than those identified as “high risk” (43%) with hazard ratio=3.84 (95% confidence interval: 1.39-10.6, p<0.01). Multivariable survival analysis showed that this model was prognostic independent of age and overall, T, and N stages with HR=2.88 (95% CI: 1.10-7.56, p=0.03).

Conclusions

A computerized image analysis model based on measurements of spatial arrangement of TILs & non-TILs was found to be prognostic in patients with OCSCC. With more modeling and development, this model may provide a risk classifier for use in routine clinical practice.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

A. Madabhushi.

Funding

US National Institutes of Health, US Department of Defense.

Disclosure

A. Madabhushi: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Serve on SAB and consult: SimbioSys; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Aiforia, Picture Health; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Picture Health; Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: Picture Health, Elucid Bioimaging, Inspirata Inc; Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties: Picture Health, Elucid Bioimaging; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.

  • Analytics cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage.

  • We use marketing cookies to build a profile of you as a user through your actions on our site in order to better understand your interests and provide you with pertinent suggestions.