Abstract 2008P
Background
Second-line pembrolizumab improves overall survival (OS) of patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). We sought to develop and validate a risk model that can predict OS and duration of response after pembrolizumab.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed pts with advanced UC treated with 2nd-line pembrolizumab post-platinum-based chemotherapy failure at a single institution (model creation cohort). We utilized univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to assess factors predicting time to progression (TTP). We sought to create a risk model depending on number of independent TTP predictors. The impact of risk groups on overall survival (OS) was examined. Validation utilized an independent dataset of pts from 59 centers. The impact of risk group on duration of response was assessed. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Results
The study comprised 565 pts (creation: 69; validation: 496). Factors predicting inferior TTP in multivariate analysis: interval from prior chemotherapy < 6 months (HR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.16-3.66, p=0.014), liver metastasis (HR: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.29-4.45, p=0.009), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status >1 (HR: 4.62, 95% CI: 2.42- 8.82, p< 0.001). In the creation cohort, median OS for pts in the favorable (0 risk factors), intermediate (1 risk factor), and poor risk (≥ 2 risk factors) groups were 29, 8.3, and 3.7 months respectively, p<0.001. The corresponding median OS times in the validation cohort were 21.6, 11.7, and 4.9 months respectively, p< 0.001. Among 538 pts evaluable for response, 174 (32%) had objective response. Median duration of response varied significantly by risk group; 38.9, 13.8, and 7.8 months for the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups respectively, p< 0.001.
Conclusions
We developed and validated a risk model that can predict durability of response and survival after 2nd-line pembrolizumab for advanced UC. Alternative systemic therapy is warranted for the poor risk group.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
S. Salah: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Janssen, Astellas. T. Kobayashi: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Janssen, Astellas, Bayer, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Janssen, Astellas; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Chugai. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1987P - TROP-2 as a promising ADC target in penile squamous cell carcinoma that promotes cell proliferation by activating AKT through PKCα pathway
Presenter: Yi Tang
Session: Poster session 13
1988P - Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab (P) outcomes outside clinical trials and biomarkers of benefit in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of the UNITE study
Presenter: Tanya Jindal
Session: Poster session 13
1989P - Efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients (pts) with (w) advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have baseline neuropathy (N) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM): A UNITE study analysis
Presenter: Albert Jang
Session: Poster session 13
1990P - MRG002-HER2 ADC combined with pucotenlimab (a PD-1 inhibitor), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): Preliminary results of a phase I/II study
Presenter: Chuanliang Cui
Session: Poster session 13
1992P - Real-world (RW) characteristics and outcomes in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) treated with adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
Presenter: Hedyeh Ebrahimi
Session: Poster session 13
1993P - A randomized, phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eribulin mesylate in combination with atezolizumab compared to atezolizumab alone in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell urothelial cancer where cisplatin-based treatment is not an option
Presenter: Anishka D'Souza
Session: Poster session 13
1994P - Updated efficacy profile of the double antibody drug conjugate (DAD) phase I trial: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) plus enfortumab vedotin (EV) in ≥ second line in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster session 13
1995P - Insights into second-line (2L) systemic treatment (tx) receipt in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Results of a retrospective observational study in Germany
Presenter: Günter Niegisch
Session: Poster session 13
1996P - Primary analysis of post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data for avelumab maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with curatively unresectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) in Japan
Presenter: Eiji Kikuchi
Session: Poster session 13