Abstract 1402MO
Background
The majority of patients are unable to complete all planned adjuvant FLOT therapy in locally-advanced gastroesophageal cancers. We examined whether pathological response to neoadjuvant FLOT can guide its adjuvant use.
Methods
Prospectively collected data from 43 centres across 12 countries was analysed. Patients with non-metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant FLOT followed by radical surgery between 2017-2022 were included. Pathological response was assessed using validated tumour regression grading (TRG) systems. All TRG were trichotomized into minimal responders (MR=worse TRG category), complete responders (CR=pathological complete response), and partial responders (PR=all TRG categories between MR and CR). Survival outcomes of patients who did and did not receive adjuvant FLOT within these cohorts were compared using Kaplan Meier and Cox regression analysis.
Results
1887 patients (MR n=459, CR n=221, PR n=1207) were evaluated. The median follow-up was 25.5 (IQR 15.0-39.0) months. 82.9% and 75.8% of patients completed all 4 cycles neoadjuvant and adjuvant FLOT respectively. Prognostic pathological features were similar between those who did and did not receive adjuvant FLOT. In the MR group, there was no DFS difference (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.78-1.36) between those who did (n=272) and did not (n=187) receive adjuvant FLOT. Whilst there was a difference in non-adjusted OS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.97), this became insignificant after adjusting for baseline characteristics (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.70-1.30). In the CR group, there was no difference in DFS (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.41-1.85) or OS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.31-1.54) between those who did (n=136) and did not (n=85) receive adjuvant FLOT. In the PR group (adjuvant FLOT n=847, no adjuvant FLOT n=360), adjuvant FLOT conferred a significant DFS (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.86) and OS (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.44-0.69) benefit.
Conclusions
Pathological response to neoadjuvant FLOT predicts therapeutic efficacy to adjuvant FLOT. Only partial responders benefit from adjuvant treatment. This challenges the current doctrine that perioperative FLOT should be applied to all patients regardless of pathological tumour response.
Clinical trial identification
ACTRN12622000180718.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre.
Funding
Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
LBA60 - Phase III study of SHR-1701 versus placebo in combination with chemo as first-line (1L) therapy for HER2-negative gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEJA)
Presenter: Zhi Peng
Session: Mini oral session: GI tumours, upper
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Invited Discussant LBA60 and 1402MO
Presenter: Radka Obermannova
Session: Mini oral session: GI tumours, upper
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
LBA63 - A randomized phase I/II study of second line treatment with liposomal irinotecan and S-1 versus liposomal irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer following gemcitabine-based chemotherapy
Presenter: Hanneke Wilmink
Session: Mini oral session: GI tumours, upper
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1504MO - Phase II trial of Pembrolizumab and OLApaRib (POLAR) maintenance for select patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) with (A) homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), (B) non-core HRD (ncHRD) and (C) exceptional response to platinum
Presenter: Wungki Park
Session: Mini oral session: GI tumours, upper
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Invited Discussant LBA63 and 1504MO
Presenter: Arndt Vogel
Session: Mini oral session: GI tumours, upper
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
965MO - Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) vs lenvatinib (LEN) or sorafenib (SOR) as first-line (1L) treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): Expanded analyses from CheckMate 9DW
Presenter: Thomas Decaens
Session: Mini oral session: GI tumours, upper
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
947MO - Five-year overall survival (OS) and OS by tumour response measures from the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)
Presenter: Lorenza Rimassa
Session: Mini oral session: GI tumours, upper
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Invited Discussant 965MO and 947MO
Presenter: James Harding
Session: Mini oral session: GI tumours, upper
Resources:
Slides
Webcast