Abstract 1581P
Background
Navya-AI is a clinically validated digital intervention that outputs patient-specific, evidence-based information; with 97% concordance between Navya-AI output and expert recommendations, and 80% adoption of recommendations by patients. Given high financial toxicity of suboptimal maintenance treatments in OC, use of AI to encourage optimal treatment has potential benefit. This study assesses the impact of Navya-AI in improving compliance to guidelines for genomic testing for women with OC in India; especially since generics for genomic testing and PARP inhibitors are cost effectively accessible in India.
Methods
Since March 2022, genomic testing for BRCA1/2 and HRD has been a recommended guideline for stage III & IV OC by NCCN, ESMO, and NCG India. From March 2022 to March 2024, all women with OC who received a Navya-AI enabled review of their treatment plan were prospectively analyzed for concordance on genomic testing and precision care. Intervention with Navya AI was used to close any identified care gaps.
Results
Of 260 OC patients who received a Navya-AI review, 80% [209/260] met guideline criteria for genomic testing. Stage I/II [47], and rare histologies [4] were excluded. Women were diverse with respect to age (years) [0-35: 6%, 35-50: 30%, 51-65: 49%, >65: 15%]; stage [III 42%, IV: 58%]; family history of cancer: 24%. Genomic testing and precision care was planned for only 30% [63/209] of the patients. In the remaining 70% [146/209], digital intervention by Navya-AI including information on the risks/benefits of genomic testing, potential use of PARP inhibitors, importance of cascade genetics, and patient navigation to their treating oncologists enabled guidelines compliance.
Conclusions
Guideline compliant care is a useful metric in tracking quality of care in gynecologic cancers, where wide care disparities exist. Positive findings on genomic testing in OC has a significant impact on progression-free survival and decreasing cancer burden. More than 60% of patients presenting to a nationally used digital health expert opinion service in India would have missed such critical testing. Through AI driven technologies, this disparity can be identified and closed, globally.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1584P - Association of travel burden (TB) with colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes in resource-limited settings (RLS)
Presenter: Saquib Banday
Session: Poster session 10
1585P - Performance status restrictions in clinical trials leading to US food and drug administration (FDA) drug approval: A cross-sectional study of a decade (2014-2023)
Presenter: Giovanni Maria Iannantuono
Session: Poster session 10
1586P - Current status of breast cancer: A comparative analysis between developed and developing countries
Presenter: Ana Isabel Martin Quesada
Session: Poster session 10
1587P - As seen through Hollywood’s lens: Cancer in movies, 2010-2020
Presenter: David Benjamin
Session: Poster session 10
1588P - Interventions to improve Herpes Zoster (HZ) vaccination rate among cancer outpatients receiving systemic treatments: A single-center real-world experience
Presenter: Sara Di Bella
Session: Poster session 10
1589P - Ramping up phase I trial recruitment: Defining potential barriers and disparities
Presenter: Burak Aktas
Session: Poster session 10
1590P - Prevalence and impact on survival of presentation to the emergency room of cancer patients: A retrospective study on real-life data
Presenter: Sonia Priou
Session: Poster session 10
1591P - Development and economic trends in new anticancer therapies licensed in the UK from 2020 to 2024
Presenter: Geetin Majhail
Session: Poster session 10
1592P - Awareness and interest of oncology professionals in sex and gender differences in cancer risk and outcome: Analysis of an ESMO Gender Medicine Task Force survey
Presenter: Berna C. Özdemir
Session: Poster session 10
1593P - Factors associated with multiple general practitioner consultations before cancer diagnosis in adolescents and young adults: A cohort study in Australia
Presenter: Jeremy Lewin
Session: Poster session 10