Abstract 1581P
Background
Navya-AI is a clinically validated digital intervention that outputs patient-specific, evidence-based information; with 97% concordance between Navya-AI output and expert recommendations, and 80% adoption of recommendations by patients. Given high financial toxicity of suboptimal maintenance treatments in OC, use of AI to encourage optimal treatment has potential benefit. This study assesses the impact of Navya-AI in improving compliance to guidelines for genomic testing for women with OC in India; especially since generics for genomic testing and PARP inhibitors are cost effectively accessible in India.
Methods
Since March 2022, genomic testing for BRCA1/2 and HRD has been a recommended guideline for stage III & IV OC by NCCN, ESMO, and NCG India. From March 2022 to March 2024, all women with OC who received a Navya-AI enabled review of their treatment plan were prospectively analyzed for concordance on genomic testing and precision care. Intervention with Navya AI was used to close any identified care gaps.
Results
Of 260 OC patients who received a Navya-AI review, 80% [209/260] met guideline criteria for genomic testing. Stage I/II [47], and rare histologies [4] were excluded. Women were diverse with respect to age (years) [0-35: 6%, 35-50: 30%, 51-65: 49%, >65: 15%]; stage [III 42%, IV: 58%]; family history of cancer: 24%. Genomic testing and precision care was planned for only 30% [63/209] of the patients. In the remaining 70% [146/209], digital intervention by Navya-AI including information on the risks/benefits of genomic testing, potential use of PARP inhibitors, importance of cascade genetics, and patient navigation to their treating oncologists enabled guidelines compliance.
Conclusions
Guideline compliant care is a useful metric in tracking quality of care in gynecologic cancers, where wide care disparities exist. Positive findings on genomic testing in OC has a significant impact on progression-free survival and decreasing cancer burden. More than 60% of patients presenting to a nationally used digital health expert opinion service in India would have missed such critical testing. Through AI driven technologies, this disparity can be identified and closed, globally.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1501P - Sex-specific variation in symptoms presentation: Experience of an outpatient clinic integrated model between radiotherapy and palliative care
Presenter: Luca Tontini
Session: Poster session 10
1502P - Sexual dysfunction and quality of life in rectal cancer
Presenter: Fatih Kus
Session: Poster session 10
1503P - Spiritual needs in cancer patients: A cross-sectional study
Presenter: Diego Toloi
Session: Poster session 10
1546P - Use of ESMO-MCBS Scorecards in supporting funding decisions in private insurance
Presenter: Samantha Field
Session: Poster session 10
1547P - Time from approval to reimbursement of new cancer and non-cancer drugs: A comparative analysis between the US, England, Germany, and Switzerland (2011-2022)
Presenter: Camille Glaus
Session: Poster session 10
1548P - Real-world impact of the platinum chemotherapy shortage on advanced cancer patients
Presenter: Jacob Reibel
Session: Poster session 10
1549P - Accelerating access to innovative oncology drugs: Insights from France's early access reform
Presenter: Tess Martin
Session: Poster session 10
1550P - Addressing uncertainties of clinical value and improving access for newly authorised indications through DRUG-Access Protocol (DAP)-like platforms: Joint collection and evaluation of real-world evidence
Presenter: Sahar van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani
Session: Poster session 10
1551P - Breakthrough therapy cancer drugs and indications with FDA approval: Development time, innovation, trials, clinical benefit, epidemiology, and price
Presenter: Christoph Michaeli
Session: Poster session 10
1552P - Regulatory approval of novel immunotherapy for lymphoid neoplasm in the US, EU, and Japan
Presenter: Kensuke Matsuda
Session: Poster session 10