Abstract 1372P
Background
NSCLC (Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma) is 85% of lung cancer incidence and remains an incurable disease for most patients. The incorporation of new immunotherapy is promising but its role in patients with advanced disease is unclear. This study looks at the survival and multiple primary malignancies of patients treated with immunotherapy and standard chemo radiotherapy, aiming to understand the most effective management that will prolong patient survival and quality of life.
Methods
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 8.4.3 program was used to obtain data. Patients aged 0-85 with NSCLC were included from 2010-2015 for the standard therapy arm, and 2015-2020 for the immunotherapy arm. Relative Survival (RS) was compared using Kaplan Meier, Log-rank analysis. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was obtained as observed/expected (O/E), considered significant if P<0.05, Excess Absolute Risk (EAR) per 10,000, and 95% confidence interval (CI). BM SPSS Statistics 27.0.1 was used to conduct the statistical analysis.
Results
We identified 14,688 patients in total, 70% were treated without immunotherapy, and 30% were treated with immunotherapy. Patients treated with immunotherapy showed better overall survival (95%CI 2.92 - 3.07, P<0.05%), and the 1-, 3-year RS was 12.7%, and 3.7% respectively. Patients with bone metastasis had the best observed survival when treated with immunotherapy, and the worst survival when treated with standard therapy (95%CI 2.86 - 3.13, P<0.05%). The immunotherapy treatment arm had low risk of developing multiple primary malignancy with O/E=1.89 (95% CI=1.84 -1.93, EAR=132.75, P<0.05%), while the standard treatment arm showed higher risk of developing multiple primary malignancy with O/E=2.25 (95% CI=2.09 - 2.42, EAR=214.6, P<0.05%), specifically adrenal gland malignancy.
Conclusions
Immunotherapy has proven its great value in increasing survival of advanced NSCLC and decreasing the risk of developing multiple primary malignancy. Patients with bone metastasis should be indicated for immunotherapy instead of standard therapy, while patients on standard therapy should be screened for other primary malignancies, including adrenal and other endocrine tumours.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1773P - Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of chondrosarcomas to explore new potential treatment options
Presenter: Konstantin Zirov
Session: Poster session 06
1774P - Immunological-molecular profiling of chondrosarcoma (ChS)
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster session 06
1775P - Peripheral blood (PB) T cell phenotype and tumor microenvironment (TME) subtype are independently associated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) outcomes in sarcomas
Presenter: Evan Rosenbaum
Session: Poster session 06
1776P - Targeting B7H3 biomimetic nanoparticles for strengthening osteosarcoma photodynamic therapy through aggravating DNA damage
Presenter: Tianqi Luo
Session: Poster session 06
1777P - Molecular profiling from next-generation sequencing (NGS) reveals new potential therapeutic targets in patients with pediatric-type sarcomas
Presenter: Anthony Conley
Session: Poster session 06
1778P - Clear cell sarcomas (CCS) express Gp100: A novel immune target for a bispecific T cell engager
Presenter: Elise Nassif Haddad
Session: Poster session 06
1779P - Deep learning tertiary lymphoid structures detection on HES/H&E slides and association to survival outcome in sarcoma
Presenter: Lucile Vanhersecke
Session: Poster session 06
1780P - Homologous recombination pathway in sarcomas: A novel opportunity of therapy?
Presenter: María del Carmen Garijo Martínez
Session: Poster session 06