Abstract 1934P
Background
Active surveillance (AS) is gradually becoming a new strategy for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The prognosis statistics and data of AS for relatively higher-risk PTC patients in China are limited. The purpose is to explore the feasibility and safety of AS in higher-risk PTC in China.
Methods
This retrospective study included PTC patients from October 2013 to October 2023. All cases were confirmed by biopsy and attended Ruijin Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital in China. Based on comprehensive risk levels, nodules that exhibit specific risk factors (larger nodule size, multifocality, located in the isthmus, and adjacent to the thyroid capsule) present a relatively higher overall risk, in comparison to the low-risk group, are defined as relatively higher-risk group.
Results
A total of 245 patients (278 nodules) were included in this study, comprising 193 (78.78%) females and 52 (21.22%) males. The number of low-risk PTC and higher-risk PTC groups were 164 and 81, respectively. The median age of the cohort was 39 (34-45) years. There was no statistically significant difference in diameter increase (0% vs. 2.47%, P=0.11), volume increase (18.91% vs. 20.99%, P=0.83), and the lymph node metastasis (LNM) rate (1.83% vs. 4.94%, P=0.49) between the low-risk PTC and relatively higher-risk PTC groups. No significant differences in the cumulative incidence of disease progression between the two groups (Kaplan-Meier analysis, all p>0.05). For patients chosen for surgery after AS, there was no significant statistically difference observed in the lymph node metastasis rates (1.83% vs. 4.94%, p=0.49). No local progression disease, distant metastasis and death due to PTC case were observed. 84.24% of patients diagnosed with PTC experienced mild to moderate levels of anxiety during the AS. In 61.84% of cases, doctors act as facilitators behind AS.
Conclusions
No significant statistically difference in disease progression was observed between the low-risk PTC and higher-risk PTC groups. Our preliminary results indicate that AS may be a novel option for relatively higher-risk PTC populations.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1525P - Nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine with or without epigenetic targeting followed by consolidating immune targeting with durvalumab and lenalidomide in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results from the SEPION/AIO-PAK-0118 phase I/II study
Presenter: Jens Siveke
Session: Poster session 18
1527P - GnP vs mFOLFIRINOX or S-IROX in metastatic pancreatic cancer: 1-year follow-up updated data from the GENERATE (JCOG1611)
Presenter: Satoshi Kobayashi
Session: Poster session 18
1528P - TCOG T5221 trial: A phase II randomized study of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in combination with S- 1/LV (GASL) or oxaliplatin (GAP) as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Yung-yeh Su
Session: Poster session 18
1531TiP - TWINPEAK phase I/II study, PT886 a bispecific antibody targeting claudin 18.2 and CD47 in combination with chemotherapy and/or pembrolizumab in gastric/GEJ-carcinomas or PDAC
Presenter: Michael Overman
Session: Poster session 18
1532TiP - Zolbetuximab with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GN) in first-line treatment of Claudin 18.2–positive metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC): Phase II, open-label, randomized study
Presenter: Wungki Park
Session: Poster session 18
1533TiP - A multicenter, open-label phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pimicotinib (CSF-1R inhibitor) in combination with chemotherapy with or without toripalimab in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC)
Presenter: Xiaofei Zhang
Session: Poster session 18