Abstract 1403P
Background
Several phase II/III studies have shown that neoadjuvant immunotherapy have promising efficacy in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In our previous reported TD-NICE study, 36 of 45 patients who received neoadjuvant tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy and surgery, major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR) is 72.0% and 50.0%. Here, we report update long-term follow-up data.
Methods
Treatment-naïve patients with resectable ESCC were enrolled. Patients received 3 cycles (3 weeks/cycle) tislelizumab (200 mg, D1), carboplatin (AUC=5, D1), and albumin-bound paclitaxel (130 mg/m2 on D1,8). The primary endpoint was MPR, secondary endpoint included pCR, R0 rate, tumor downstaging rate and safety.
Results
By April 2024, with a median follow-up of 39.2 months, 17 patients (37.8%) had died (11 in the surgery group and 6 in the non- surgery group). The median OS of the ITT group and the surgery group was not reached, and the median OS of the non- surgery group was 32.9m. The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS rates were 86.7%, 71.1% and 64.3% in all patients, 88.9%, 77.8%, 69.3% and 66.7%, 55.6%, 44.4% in the surgery and non- surgery groups, respectively. The OS results of R0 resection, pCR and MPR subgroups are shown in the table below. The mOS of R1 & R2 group was 20.5 months, which was statistically lower compared with R0 group (p=0.034), while there was no statistically significant difference among other subgroups. The EFS at 1 year, 2 years and 3 years were 88.9%, 75.0% and 69.3%. The trends of EFS were similar as OS.
Table: 1403P
Subgroup | 1y-OS, % | 2y-OS, % | 3y-OS, % |
ITT | 86.7 | 71.1 | 64.3 |
Surgery | 91.7 | 77.8 | 69.3 |
Non-surgery | 66.7 | 55.6 | 44.4 |
R0 | 96.6 | 82.8 | 75.7 |
R1&R2 | 71.4 | 42.9 | 42.9 |
MPR | 96.2 | 80.8 | 72.9 |
Non-MPR | 80.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 |
pCR | 94.4 | 77.8 | 72.2 |
Non-pCR | 88.9 | 72.2 | 66.7 |
Conclusions
Neoadjuvant tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy showed long-term survival benefit in ESCC patients, especially in R0 resection and surgery patients.
Clinical trial identification
ChiCTR2000037488.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
972P - Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib vs sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-center real-world study from the LINK Research Network
Presenter: Jung Yong Hong
Session: Poster session 17
973P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Overall survival using real-world data from TrinetX platform
Presenter: Lisardo Ugidos De La Varga
Session: Poster session 17
977P - Transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus tislelizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Yi Chen
Session: Poster session 17
978P - Efficacy and safety analysis of transarterial chemoembolization combined donafenib with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors in for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A prospective, single-arm, single center, phase Ⅱ clinical study
Presenter: Jinpeng Li
Session: Poster session 17
979P - Initial results from the phase II randomized trial comparing TACE with irinotecan and mitomycin C to doxorubicin in intermediate stage HCC (IRITACE trial)
Presenter: Oliver Waidmann
Session: Poster session 17