Abstract 1013P
Background
Rivoceranib (Rivo) is an oral small molecular receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively inhibits VEGFR. Preclinical studies have demonstrated increased PD-L1 expression after initial treatment with anti-VEGF inhibitors as well as an increase in effector T cells (Zhao et al., 2017). This phase 1 study (NCT03396211) evaluated safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and selected immunologic effects of the combination of Rivo and nivolumab (Nivo) in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic solid tumors.
Methods
Part 1 evaluated the safety of increasing oral daily doses of Rivo (400, 500, 600, and 700 mg/day) with Nivo 240 mg administered IV q2w until the MTD was determined. Part 2 evaluated the safety of the MTD or 700 mg/day of Rivo, whichever was lower, with Nivo in an expansion cohort of up to 20 pts. The primary outcome measures included safety, tolerability, and efficacy measures.
Results
30 pts enrolled in the study (n=10 in Part 1, n=20 in Part 2). Rivo 400 mg/day was the starting dose in cohort 1 and was de-escalated to 300 mg following a DLT of grade (Gr) 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea in 2 patients. The second cohort evaluated Rivo 300 mg, and 1 pt experienced DLTs of uncontrolled hypertension and Gr 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea; therefore, the MTD was Rivo 300 mg/day combined with Nivo 240 mg IV q2w. The most common (≥20%) Gr ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hypertension (66.7%), generalized rash (33.3%), ALT increased (33.3%), neutropenia (33.3%) (Part 1 400 mg cohort); anemia (42.9%) (Part 1 300 mg cohort); anemia and hypophosphatemia (20% each) (Part 2 300 mg cohort). 46.7% of pts experienced a serious AE. Efficacy results are displayed in the table. Table: 1013P
Efficacy results
Part 1 400 mgcohort (n=3) | Part 1 300 mgcohort (n=7) | Part 2 300 mgcohort (n=20) | Overall (n=30) | |
ORR, n (%) | 0 | 1 (14.3) | 4 (20.0) | 5 (16.7) |
CR, n (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PR | 0 | 1 (14.3) | 4 (20.0) | 5 (16.7) |
SD, n (%) | 3 (100.0) | 3 (42.9) | 13 (65.0) | 19 (63.3) |
PD, n (%) | 0 | 1 (14.3) | 2 (10.0) | 3 (10.0) |
Not evaluable, n (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Missing, n (%) | 0 (0) | 2 (28.6) | 1 (5.0) | 3 (10.0) |
Time to response, months | N/A | 5.6 | 4.5 | 5.3 |
DoR, months | N/A | 1.8 | 2.8 | 2.0 |
DCR, n (%) | 3 (100) | 4 (57.1) | 17 (85.0) | 24 (80.0) |
Conclusions
Rivo 300 mg + Nivo 240 mg IV q2w demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor efficacy in pts with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Further studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of this combination.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03396211.
Editorial acknowledgement
Olivia Adams, The Phillips Group Oncology Communications, Inc.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Elevar Therapeutics.
Funding
Elevar Therapeutics.
Disclosure
C.H. Park: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Elevar Therapeutics. S.P. Chawla: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Amgen, Roche, GSK, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, CytRx Corporation, Ignyta, Immune Design, TRACON Pharma, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration (SARC), Janssen, Advenchen Laboratories, Bayer, Inhibrx, NKMax, Thyme; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Amgen, Roche, GSK, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, CytRx Corporation, Ignyta, Immune Design, TRACON Pharma, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration (SARC), Janssen, Advenchen Laboratories, Bayer, Inhibrx, NKMax, Thyme; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Amgen, Roche, GSK, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, CytRx Corporation, Ignyta, Immune Design, TRACON Pharma, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration (SARC), Janssen, Advenchen Laboratories, Bayer, Inhibrx, NKMax, Thyme; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AADi, Cellestia Biotech, CounterPoint, Immix, BioPharma. X. Meng, W.R. Strickland, L.A. Finis, C. Galloway: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Elevar Therapeutics. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
907P - Biomarker analysis of the phase III KEYNOTE-040 study of pembrolizumab (pembro) versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab (SOC) for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)
Presenter: Denis Soulieres
Session: Poster session 03
909P - Immunoscore-IC predicts nivolumab efficacy as adjuvant treatment after salvage surgery in head and neck cancer squamous cell carcinoma: The ADJORL1 trial
Presenter: Alix Marhic
Session: Poster session 03
911P - Association of genomic landscape and plasma protein dynamic changes with clinical outcome in patients with R/M HNSCC treated with pembrolizumab with nab-paclitaxel and platinum
Presenter: Xinrui Chen
Session: Poster session 03
912P - Selection of personalized salvage treatments in advanced refractory head and neck squamous cell carcinomas via multi-omics tumor profiling
Presenter: Ramin Ajami
Session: Poster session 03
913P - Characterisation of genomic biomarkers of response to cetuximab versus cisplatin in concomitance with radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous head and neck cancer
Presenter: Juan Carlos Redondo González
Session: Poster session 03
914P - The landscape of somatic copy number alterations of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma across different anatomic sites
Presenter: Juan Carlos Redondo González
Session: Poster session 03
915P - Longer OS and RFS for CD3high/PD-L1+ head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients
Presenter: Simon Laban
Session: Poster session 03
916P - Deep spatial profiling of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma offers insights into the tumor microenvironment of hpv-stratified patients
Presenter: Abhishek Aggarwal
Session: Poster session 03