Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini oral session: CNS tumours

453MO - A phase I study for safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor activity of ABM-1310 in patients (pts) with BRAF V600 mutated recurrent primary brain tumours: Interim result

Date

15 Sep 2024

Session

Mini oral session: CNS tumours

Topics

Clinical Research

Tumour Site

Central Nervous System Malignancies

Presenters

Wenbin Li

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S406-S427. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1587

Authors

W. Li1, Z. Kang1, S. Li1, F. Chen1, B. Zhang1, M. Huang1, Z. Yang2, C. Chen3, Z. Yang4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Neuro-oncology Department, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100070 - Beijing/CN
  • 2 Clinical Development Department, ABM, 201315 - Shanghai/CN
  • 3 Ceo, ABM, 201315 - Shanghai/CN
  • 4 Clinical Development Department, ABM, 92618 - Irvine/US

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 453MO

Background

ABM-1310 is a high blood brain barrier penetrant BRAF inhibitor. Here we report the interim result from a phase I study of ABM-1310 in pts with recurrent primary brain tumors (Clinical trial information: NCT05892653).

Methods

This is an open-label, dose-escalation with cohort expansion study. In the dose-escalation part, pts received ABM-1310 at either 150 or 200mg bid. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were assessed by a “3+3 design”. Primary objectives were maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety and tolerability of ABM-1310. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics (PK) and anti-tumor activity.

Results

As of April 8, 2024, 15 pts (7 male; median age 39 years) have been treated. Eight received 150mg bid, 7 were on 200mg bid of ABM-1310. For safety, all pts experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Two most common TRAEs were asymptomatic QT prolongation (n=11) and rash (n=8). Grade 1-2 TRAEs accounts for 88.7% of cases. Seven pts had Grade 3 ECG QT prolongation. There was only one pt who was in the 150mg bid dose group discontinued earlier due to asymptomatic Grade 3 QT prolongation. In the 200mg bid dose group, 3 pts each needed either treatment withholding or a dose reduction, respectively. There were no DLT events, no Grade 4 AE, no SAE and no treatment-related deaths. For anti-tumor activity, among 13 efficacy evaluable pts, 3 pts had partial response (PR, includes glioblastoma [GBM], WHO Grade 2 and 3 each of pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma) and 8 pts had stable disease as their best response. Two pts maintained a PR response for > 8 months and continue study treatment to date. The MTD for ABM-1310 was 200mg bid. The regimen of ABM-1310 150mg bid was chosen for the expansion cohorts. Preliminary PK assessment of ABM-1310 blood exposure vs. dosage showed a linear dose-proportional relationship. The trial is ongoing.

Conclusions

ABM-1310 was generally tolerated without unknown safety signals. Preliminary anti-tumor activity was observed in pts with BRAF V600-mutated recurrent primary brain tumors.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

ABM.

Funding

ABM.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.