Abstract 209P
Background
A key challenge in precision oncology is to develop predictive markers that identify patients likely to respond to a given treatment, ideally before clinical trials are performed so that they can be effectively used in clinical trial design. Even when markers are developed early, evaluating them is challenging in the absence of interventional data. We introduce the Surrogate Clinical Outcome Test (SCOT), which assesses, using non-interventional data, the predictivity of a drug-specific marker in clinical settings.
Methods
SCOT assumes that patients with low (native) expression of the investigated drug target(s) have a similar survival profile to patients actually receiving the drug. A marker score predictive of response to the drug will therefore have a negative hazard ratio (HR) in patients with low expression of the drug target(s). To exclude markers that are merely prognostic, SCOT requires that the HR is higher when the target expression is high. We tested SCOT on predictive markers previously published or generated using our ENLIGHT platform for 7 drug classes and on two known prognostic biomarkers: KI67 and Proliferation Index (PI).
Results
Of the 7 treatment response markers tested, SCOT classified 5 as predictive to the respective drug. 4 of the 5 were confirmed as predictive on interventional data (response prediction AUC > 0.6). Of the 2 markers SCOT classified as non-predictive, 1 was confirmed as such on interventional data. SCOT also correctly classified KI67 and PI as prognostic, non-predictive markers. Overall, SCOT’s classification was confirmed for 7 out of 9 biomarkers (78% accuracy).
Conclusions
SCOT is a novel method to test predictive markers for virtually any targeted cancer drug using big non-interventional clinical data. A key feature of this method is that it can evaluate predictive biomarkers for drugs, based on human data, even before the drug enters clinical development. Combined with our ENLIGHT platform for generating predictive markers in the absence of direct response data, this creates a powerful pipeline for early biomarker development and evaluation.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
G. Dinstag, Y. Kinar, R. E. Bell, D. S. Ben-Zvi, E. Elis, E. Maimon, R. Aharonov: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pangea Biomed. T. Beker: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Pangea Biomed; Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Pangea Biomed.
Resources from the same session
1192P - Optimizing lung cancer screening: Independent verification of an AI/ML computer-aided detection and characterization software as medical device
Presenter: Sylvain Bodard
Session: Poster session 09
1194P - Development of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to detect pulmonary nodules on chest radiography
Presenter: Mitsunori Higuchi
Session: Poster session 09
1195P - Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) screening in Li Fraumeni syndrome for early cancer diagnosis: The SIGNIFIED project
Presenter: Elena Cojocaru
Session: Poster session 09
1196P - Organoid growth-based oncological sensitivity test (OncoSensi) for predicting adjuvant therapy outcomes in ovarian cancer patients
Presenter: Dong Woo Lee
Session: Poster session 09
1197P - Ex vivo basket study reports patient-specific sensitivity to carboplatin versus cisplatin in lung, ovarian and bladder cancer
Presenter: Debbie Robbrecht
Session: Poster session 09
1198P - Analytical validation of an NGS panel-based ecDNA detection device for use as a clinical trial assay for the POTENTIATE clinical study of the novel CHK1 inhibitor, BBI-355
Presenter: Pontis Julien
Session: Poster session 09