Abstract 2370P
Background
Pembrolizumab (pembro) is approved for the II-line in mUC. In PEANUT trial (NCT03464734) we investigated the efficacy of the combination of pembro plus nab-paclitaxel after chemotherapy (CT) failure. Herein, a long-term follow-up (FUP) update and a post-hoc analysis are presented.
Methods
In an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial pts with mUC after failure of ≤2 platinum-based CT were enrolled. Pts received 200 mg pembro on D1, and 125 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel on D1 and D8, every 3 weeks, until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS).
Results
As of April 1, 2023, 11/70 (15.7%) pts enrolled are in CR after a median FUP of 45.5 mo (95% CI, 42.3 – 49.8). 5/70 (7.1%) completed 2-yrs of treatment. Median OS was 11.7 mo (95% CI, 8.27 – 17.2) and median PFS was 5.1 mo (95% CI, 4.1 – 7.37). The ORR was 47.1%. For CR or PR pts, median OS was 28.4 mo (95% CI, 16.2 – NA). OS rate was 19 (27.1%) at 46 mo. Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 12/70 (17.4%) pts: in 9/70 only nab-paclitaxel, in 3/70 both. After PD, 22/70 (32.4%) patients underwent further therapies. Levels of hemoglobin (HR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.76 – 1; p value 0.095) and NLR at baseline (HR 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1 – 1.3; p value 0.0032), discontinuation due to toxicity (HR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.14 – 0.79; p value 0.012) and subsequent therapy (HR 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3 – 4.4; p value 0.0033) appear to have a statistically significant impact in PFS. Instead, the primary (bladder vs UTUC) (HR 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1 – 4.7; p value 0.027), liver metastases (HR 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3 – 4.2; p value 0.0032), NLR at baseline (HR 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1 – 1.3; p value 0.0014) and discontinuation due to toxicity (HR 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16 – 0.89; p value 0.026) seem to have a greater influence on OS.
Conclusions
After nearly 4 years, the combination of pembrolizumab and nab-paclitaxel maintained clinically meaningful efficacy in pts with mUC that progressed after platinum-based CT. OS data and post-hoc analyzes are consistent with what has been published in the literature in this disease setting.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03464734.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano - Italy.
Funding
This study was partially supported by Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Disclosure
E. Verzoni: Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Janssen, Ipsen, MSD, Pfizer, Merck, Novartis. G. Procopio: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, consultant fees: Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Janssen, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, research funding for no profit clinical trial: Ipsen. A. Necchi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Merck, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, BMS, Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member: Roche, Janssen, Bayer, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Merck, Clovis Oncology; Financial Interests, Coordinating PI: Incyte; Financial Interests, Local PI: Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role: Global society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors (GSRGT). P. Giannatempo: Financial Interests, Personal, Local PI: Merck, Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Ipsen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1902P - Comparison of cabozantinib (CABO) versus sunitinib (SUN) following first-line (1L) nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A target trial emulation using real-world data from the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC)
Presenter: Audreylie Lemelin
Session: Poster session 23
1903P - Tumor response by baseline metastases in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with lenvatinib (L) plus pembrolizumab (P) vs sunitinib (S): Post hoc analysis of the CLEAR trial
Presenter: Viktor Gruenwald
Session: Poster session 23
1904P - Treatment options and outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with brain or bone metastases: A real-world evidence from a German retrospective multi-center analysis
Presenter: Pia Paffenholz
Session: Poster session 23
1905P - Heterogeneity in tertiary lymphoid structures predicts the distinct prognosis and immune microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Wenhao Xu
Session: Poster session 23
1906P - Metastasized non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Which entities are dangerous? Results learned from reference pathology of the SuniForecast study
Presenter: Arndt Hartmann
Session: Poster session 23
1907P - Multi-omics mapping positions antigenic myeloid-T cell crosstalk at the core of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)
Presenter: Lisa Kinget
Session: Poster session 23
1908P - Utility of circulating tumor (ct)DNA testing for molecular residual disease (MRD) detection and treatment response monitoring in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Michael Smigelski
Session: Poster session 23
1909P - Baseline cytokine levels according to the line of treatment in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab: NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 translational study
Presenter: Larissa Rainho
Session: Poster session 23
1910P - Evaluation of a genome-wide methylome enrichment platform for circulating tumor DNA quantification and prognostic performance in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Brian Rini
Session: Poster session 23