Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini oral session - Gynaecological cancers

LBA43 - Updated response data and analysis of progression free survival by mechanism of mismatch repair loss in endometrial cancer (EC) patients (pts) treated with pembrolizumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) as compared to CP plus placebo (PBO) in the NRG GY018 trial

Date

22 Oct 2023

Session

Mini oral session - Gynaecological cancers

Topics

Translational Research;  Response Evaluation (RECIST Criteria);  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Endometrial Cancer

Presenters

Ramez Eskander

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S1254-S1335. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)04149-2

Authors

R.N. Eskander1, M. Sill2, A. Miller2, L. Beffa3, R. Moore4, J. Hope5, F. Musa6, R. Mannel7, M.S. Shahin8, G. Canturia9, E. Girda10, C. Mathews11, J. Kavecansky12, C.A. Leath III13, L. Gien14, E. Hinchcliff15, S. Lele16, M.A. Powell17, C. Aghajanian18

Author affiliations

  • 1 Obstetrics, Gynecology And Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego - UCSD, 92093 - La Jolla/US
  • 2 Ctdd, NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, 19103 - Philadelphia/US
  • 3 Gynecologic Oncology, Case Western Reserve University / University Hospitals, 44106 - Cleveland/US
  • 4 , Division Of Gynecologic Oncology, URMC - University of Rochester Medical Center, 14615 - Rochester/US
  • 5 Gynecologic Oncology, Alaska Women’s Cancer Care, 99508 - Anchorage/US
  • 6 Gynecologic Oncology, Pacific Cancer Care, 93940 - Monterey/US
  • 7 Gynecologic Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma University Health Science Center, 73104 - Oklahoma City/US
  • 8 Gynecologic Oncology Department, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center - Thomas Jefferson University, 19107 - Philadelphia/US
  • 9 Gynecologic Oncology, Georgia Cancer Specialists affiliated with Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, 30060 - Atlanta/US
  • 10 Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 08903 - New Brunswick/US
  • 11 Gynecologic Oncology Department, Women & Infants Hospital - Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown Univ, 02905 - Providence/US
  • 12 Hematology And Oncology Dept., The Permanente Medical Group, 95119 - San Jose/US
  • 13 Obstetrics & Gynecology Department, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294-3300 - Birmingham/US
  • 14 Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre - Odette Cancer Centre, M4N 3M5 - Toronto/CA
  • 15 Gynecologic Oncology, Northwestern Medical Group, 60611 - Chicago/US
  • 16 Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, 14263 - Buffalo/US
  • 17 Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute Sponsored NRG Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 19103 - Philadelphia/US
  • 18 Gynecologic Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Evelyn H. Lauder Breast Center, 10065 - New York/US

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract LBA43

Background

NRG GY018 identified a 70% and 46% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in advanced stage or recurrent dMMR and pMMR EC patients treated with pembrolizumab plus CP. The relationship between mechanism of MMR deficiency and clinical outcomes in dMMR EC patients is not well understood.

Methods

819 pts were randomized 1:1 to pembrolizumab + CP or PBO + CP Q3W for 6 cycles followed by maintenance pembrolizumab or PBO Q6W for up to 2 years. MMR status was assessed by local and central immunohistochemistry (IHC). For patients with measurable disease at enrollment, updated best response (RECIST 1.1) was examined in both patient cohorts. Mechanism of MMR loss was determined by review of local MMR IHC results and presence/absence of MLH1 promoter hypermethylation. The effect of mechanism of MMR loss on PFS was examined in dMMR patients treated with pembrolizumab.

Results

Local and central MMR IHC had strong agreement, kappa 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.91). The ORR was improved in the pembrolizumab arm of both patient cohorts (dMMR: 81.5% vs. 70.7%, OR 1.83 (95% CI 0.92-3.66) and pMMR: 70.7% vs. 58.1%, OR 1.74 (95% CI 1.18-2.58)). The CR rate in the dMMR and pMMR EC cohorts was higher when pembrolizumab was added to CP (15% vs 32% dMMR; 8% vs 15% pMMR). Median DOR was significantly improved with addition of pembrolizumab, dMMR 28.7 mo vs 6.2 mo (HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.13-0.37, p<.0001) and pMMR 9.2 mo vs 6.2 mo (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.34-0.64, p<.0001). In 223 central-dMMR pts, 72% had MLH1 promoter hypermethylation, 13% had MMR protein loss secondary to gene mutation, and 15% were not evaluable. Mechanism of MMR loss was not a significant predictor of PFS (85% versus 75% progression free at 12 months in mutated vs methylated pts). Median PFS and OS were not reached irrespective of mechanism of MMR loss.

Conclusions

In NRG GY018, no difference in PFS was identified in dMMR EC patients based on mechanism of MMR loss. With more mature clinical follow up, the magnitude of benefit in both patient cohorts treated with pembrolizumab was maintained, with significant improved in ORR, and DOR.

Clinical trial identification

NCT04214067.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

NCI/CTEP.

Funding

Merck.

Disclosure

R.N. Eskander: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Myriad, Seagen, Immunogen, Nuvectis Pharma, Gilead, Regeneron, Acrivon; Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Merck, Novocure, Xencor, CanaryBio. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.