Abstract 1746P
Background
On-call work is an inherent component of Oncology care. Managerial models focus on length of stay in calculating efficiency within hospitals. Ensuring compliance with the European Working Time Directives (EWTD) for doctors is a legal requirement for Hospitals. Calculations of required physician staff to provide overnight care is not necessarily based on numbers of patients to be cared for, nor the complexity of care. The acute oncology service (AOS) after-hours has to date been provided by the day-time medical team in whole. To improve safety and quality of the AOS for patients being seen after hours, as well as to comply with the EWTD, a change to shift-work for the 1st-on-call oncology doctor is planned in 7/23. We sought to quantify the impact on the service.
Methods
The numbers of non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs), with allowances for full staff and also allowing for annual and educational leave entitlements were gathered for 1) pre-shift work implementation and 2) post-implementation of shift work. The number of NCHDs multiplied by the hours available to the ambulatory services (day unit and outpatient clinics) were calculated per week for both service structures to produce the "available NCHD hours".
Results
Assuming the normal working day is 8am to 5pm, this change would result in the reduction of available NCHDs to the ambulatory oncology service from 270 available NCHD hours per week to 171 available NCHD hours once vacation and study leave are factored into the equation, despite the addition of one NCHD to the medical oncology team. This represents a 36% reduction in available staff yet with a likely continued increase in patient activity.
Conclusions
While modifying the after-hours service to shift-work augments availability of medical staff for the acutely unwell patient with cancer and achieves compliance with EWTD, it reduces the numbers of doctors available for a significant part of the day, placing more strain on those doctors trying to manage a similar number of patients in a safe and patient-focused manner. Changes to the after-hours service inadvertently has knock-on effects on the “Oncology Ecosystem” and may impact on future service quality. Adjustments to NCHD numbers to cover the predicted significant staff fall short of those required.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Beaumont RCSI Cancer Centre.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1902P - Comparison of cabozantinib (CABO) versus sunitinib (SUN) following first-line (1L) nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A target trial emulation using real-world data from the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC)
Presenter: Audreylie Lemelin
Session: Poster session 23
1903P - Tumor response by baseline metastases in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with lenvatinib (L) plus pembrolizumab (P) vs sunitinib (S): Post hoc analysis of the CLEAR trial
Presenter: Viktor Gruenwald
Session: Poster session 23
1904P - Treatment options and outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with brain or bone metastases: A real-world evidence from a German retrospective multi-center analysis
Presenter: Pia Paffenholz
Session: Poster session 23
1905P - Heterogeneity in tertiary lymphoid structures predicts the distinct prognosis and immune microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Wenhao Xu
Session: Poster session 23
1906P - Metastasized non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Which entities are dangerous? Results learned from reference pathology of the SuniForecast study
Presenter: Arndt Hartmann
Session: Poster session 23
1907P - Multi-omics mapping positions antigenic myeloid-T cell crosstalk at the core of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)
Presenter: Lisa Kinget
Session: Poster session 23
1908P - Utility of circulating tumor (ct)DNA testing for molecular residual disease (MRD) detection and treatment response monitoring in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Michael Smigelski
Session: Poster session 23
1909P - Baseline cytokine levels according to the line of treatment in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab: NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 translational study
Presenter: Larissa Rainho
Session: Poster session 23
1910P - Evaluation of a genome-wide methylome enrichment platform for circulating tumor DNA quantification and prognostic performance in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Brian Rini
Session: Poster session 23
1911P - Effect of VHL mutations on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Guojie Yu
Session: Poster session 23