Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 04

1311P - Understanding the basis for intrinsic resistance to KRASG12C inhibitors

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 04

Topics

Clinical Research;  Targeted Therapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Alba Santos Ramos

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S746-S754. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01266-8

Authors

A. Santos Ramos1, D. Gómez Sánchez1, P. Plaza Expósito1, L. Paz-Ares2, I. Ferrer Sánchez1

Author affiliations

  • 1 H12o - Cnio Lung Cancer Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), 28041 - Madrid/ES
  • 2 Medical Oncology Department - Edificio Maternidad 2ª Planta, Universidad Compultsense de Madrid, 28040 - Madrid/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1311P

Background

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. KRAS is the most frequent mutated oncogen in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), but it has been recognized as undruggable for many years. KRASG12C inhibitors (KRASG12Ci), are being tested in clinical trials and have revealed promising results in LUAD patients. With these results, two KRASG12Ci have been approved for the treatment of LUAD patients by the FDA, which marks the first approved targeted therapy for KRAS-mutated tumors. While these therapies hold great promise, they face the same limitation as other targeted therapies, the therapeutic potential of these inhibitors can be impaired by resistance. Deciphering intrinsic resistance mechanisms to KRASG12Ci is of prime relevance to predict which patients may benefit from these therapies and to propose therapeutic alternatives.

Methods

The efficacy of two different KRASG12Ci was tested in different KRASG12C-mutated models, in vitro in a panel of 8 LUAD cell lines and 7 PDX-derived organoids (PDXDO) models and in vivo in a panel of 7 patient-derived xenografts (PDX) models. Thus, we define the intrinsic and resistance models, and compare the genomic (WES) and transcriptomic (WTS) data to find a signature that defines the intrinsic resistance to each drug.

Results

Among the 8 LUAD cell lines, we found 3 very sensitive cell lines and 2 intrinsic resistant ones. Among the 7 PDXDO models, we found 4 sensitive models and 3 intrinsic resistant ones. And among the PDX models we found two very sensitive models and two intrinsic resistant ones. These ratios are representative of what was found among patients in clinical trials. Comparative transcriptomic analysis from sensitive and intrinsic resistant models showed different basal levels of expression and/or activation of downstream signaling pathways of KRAS, ARF or PLC and of various receptors such as ERBB, FGFR or IGF-1R.

Conclusions

1) We found a transcriptomic signature that define the intrinsic resistance, characterized by a greater basal expression and/or activation of some RTKs and signaling pathways. 2) We identificate some molecular alterations which could be responsible of the intrinsic resistance and could acts as predictive biomarkers and/or serve as therapeutic targets in combination with KRASG12Ci.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

L.P.A. was funded by the Comunidad de Madrid, CAM, (B2017/BMD3884), AECC, CRIS, ISCIII (PI17/00778; PI20/00820; AC20/0070) and CIBERONC (CD16/12/00442), and co-funded by FEDER from Regional Development European Funds (European Union). I.F. is funded by i+12 and ISCIII (PI16/01311; PI19/00320; CP21/00052) and co-funded by FEDER from Regional Development European Funds (European Union). A.S. was funded by Ministerio FPU18/06237.

Disclosure

L. Paz-Ares: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Speaker fees: Roche, MSD, BMS, AZ, Lilly, PharmaMar, BeiGene, Daiichi, Medscape, Per; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck Serono, Pfizer, Bayer, Amgen, Janssen, GSK, Novartis, Takeda, Sanofi, Mirati; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Board member: Genomica, Altum sequencing; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, BMS, Janssen-Cilag International NV, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Tesaro, Alkermes, Lilly, Takeda, Pfizer, PharmaMar; Financial Interests, Personal, Coordinating PI: Amgen; Financial Interests, Other, Member: AACR, ASCO, ESMO; Financial Interests, Other, Foundation Board Member: AECC; Financial Interests, Other, President.ASEICA( Spanish Association of Cancer Research): ASEICA; Financial Interests, Other, Foundation president: ONCOSUR; Financial Interests, Other, member: Small Lung Cancer Group. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.