Abstract 1311P
Background
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. KRAS is the most frequent mutated oncogen in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), but it has been recognized as undruggable for many years. KRASG12C inhibitors (KRASG12Ci), are being tested in clinical trials and have revealed promising results in LUAD patients. With these results, two KRASG12Ci have been approved for the treatment of LUAD patients by the FDA, which marks the first approved targeted therapy for KRAS-mutated tumors. While these therapies hold great promise, they face the same limitation as other targeted therapies, the therapeutic potential of these inhibitors can be impaired by resistance. Deciphering intrinsic resistance mechanisms to KRASG12Ci is of prime relevance to predict which patients may benefit from these therapies and to propose therapeutic alternatives.
Methods
The efficacy of two different KRASG12Ci was tested in different KRASG12C-mutated models, in vitro in a panel of 8 LUAD cell lines and 7 PDX-derived organoids (PDXDO) models and in vivo in a panel of 7 patient-derived xenografts (PDX) models. Thus, we define the intrinsic and resistance models, and compare the genomic (WES) and transcriptomic (WTS) data to find a signature that defines the intrinsic resistance to each drug.
Results
Among the 8 LUAD cell lines, we found 3 very sensitive cell lines and 2 intrinsic resistant ones. Among the 7 PDXDO models, we found 4 sensitive models and 3 intrinsic resistant ones. And among the PDX models we found two very sensitive models and two intrinsic resistant ones. These ratios are representative of what was found among patients in clinical trials. Comparative transcriptomic analysis from sensitive and intrinsic resistant models showed different basal levels of expression and/or activation of downstream signaling pathways of KRAS, ARF or PLC and of various receptors such as ERBB, FGFR or IGF-1R.
Conclusions
1) We found a transcriptomic signature that define the intrinsic resistance, characterized by a greater basal expression and/or activation of some RTKs and signaling pathways. 2) We identificate some molecular alterations which could be responsible of the intrinsic resistance and could acts as predictive biomarkers and/or serve as therapeutic targets in combination with KRASG12Ci.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
L.P.A. was funded by the Comunidad de Madrid, CAM, (B2017/BMD3884), AECC, CRIS, ISCIII (PI17/00778; PI20/00820; AC20/0070) and CIBERONC (CD16/12/00442), and co-funded by FEDER from Regional Development European Funds (European Union). I.F. is funded by i+12 and ISCIII (PI16/01311; PI19/00320; CP21/00052) and co-funded by FEDER from Regional Development European Funds (European Union). A.S. was funded by Ministerio FPU18/06237.
Disclosure
L. Paz-Ares: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Speaker fees: Roche, MSD, BMS, AZ, Lilly, PharmaMar, BeiGene, Daiichi, Medscape, Per; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck Serono, Pfizer, Bayer, Amgen, Janssen, GSK, Novartis, Takeda, Sanofi, Mirati; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Board member: Genomica, Altum sequencing; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, BMS, Janssen-Cilag International NV, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Tesaro, Alkermes, Lilly, Takeda, Pfizer, PharmaMar; Financial Interests, Personal, Coordinating PI: Amgen; Financial Interests, Other, Member: AACR, ASCO, ESMO; Financial Interests, Other, Foundation Board Member: AECC; Financial Interests, Other, President.ASEICA( Spanish Association of Cancer Research): ASEICA; Financial Interests, Other, Foundation president: ONCOSUR; Financial Interests, Other, member: Small Lung Cancer Group. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
457P - Disparities in receipt of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy as therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the real-world setting
Presenter: Gretchen Kimmick
Session: Poster session 04
458P - Metastatic breast cancer: How and how often do we communicate? Results from an Italian national survey
Presenter: Camilla Lisanti
Session: Poster session 04
460P - Impact of fulvestrant utilization on prognostic outcome among patients with HR+ve/HER2-ve metastatic breast cancer: Results from a real-world dataset
Presenter: Shaheenah Dawood
Session: Poster session 04
462P - Health outcomes of treatment sequences with eribulin or other single agents’ chemotherapy for treating relapsed metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Simone Rivolo
Session: Poster session 04
463P - Impact of two waves of Sars-Cov-2 outbreak on the clinical presentation and outcomes of newly referred breast cancer cases at AP-HP: A retrospective multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Sonia Priou
Session: Poster session 04
464P - Developing a prognostic risk stratification model and treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis
Presenter: JiaXin Chen
Session: Poster session 04
465P - Reporting of older subgroups enrolled to registration breast cancer trials, 2012-2021
Presenter: Colm Mac Eochagain
Session: Poster session 04