Abstract 530P
Background
High grade gliomas are primary malignant brain tumors where surgery followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy remains the standard of care. Majority of patients manifest with post treatment changes like necrosis, edema or pseudoprogression for which the management is challenging. Currently steroids remain the treatment of choice in such scenarios but have many dose limiting toxicities. Bevacizumab (BEV) is approved in recurrent HGG. Fewer studies with dose de escalation up to 50% of standard dose have attained similar results in control. However it's anti angiogenic/anti edema effect is quite unexplored in management of post treatment changes. In our study, we analyzed the role of BEVULTRA-100 in symptomatic/asymptomatic HGG as an alternative to steroids.
Methods
In this prospective, interventional single arm study, 117 patients of HGG treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy as primary modality from July 2013 till April 2023 were included. All patients received Ultra-Low Dose Bevacizumab - 100 mg once in every month along with oral temozolomide. Complete blood counts and vitals were monitored before each cycle. All patients were assessed at regular intervals for clinical and imaging parameters-DOPA PETCT & MRI in regards with post treatment changes.
Results
Median age was 44.5 years Range: 9 to 70. M:F ratio of 1.54 :1. A Median of 12 cycles UltraBEV (Range:1 to 62) were received (1514 cycles in total). All patients tolerated well without any significant toxicities. None of the patients had intracranial/ tumoral bleed. Use of steroids was markedly reduced in more than 90% patients with BEVULTRA-100 resulting in substantial improvement in the QOL. Similar pattern was observed in imaging parameters including reduction of post treatment edema.
Conclusions
This pilot study aims at providing a proof of concept for BEVUltra100 in management of post treatment changes in HGGs. This is a feasible, cost effective option with better compliance compared to steroids with improved survival. This study also paves a trailblazing path for exploring the field of radiation dose escalation and reirradiation with adequate control over toxicities improving the QOL, which might translate into improved survival.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
622P - Evaluation of the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) in predicting outcome for patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line (1L) panitumumab (PAN) plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX: Updated interim results of the non-interventional study VALIDATE
Presenter: Marcel Reiser
Session: Poster session 10
623P - VIC regimen (vemurafenib/irinotecan/cetuximab) versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster session 10
624P - Tolerability and safety of vemurafenib, cetuximab combined with camrelizumab for BRAF V600E-mutated /MSS metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Meng Qiu
Session: Poster session 10
625P - Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO real-world multicentre study
Presenter: Claire Gallois
Session: Poster session 10
626P - Mucinous differentiation (MD) as predictor of response in BRAF-V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) combinations
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster session 10