Abstract 1733P
Background
On 24th of February 2022 reality in Ukraine changed. Ukraine became a victim of unfair attack of the neighbouring county. It influenced civilian population hugely, including the most vulnerable - children, elderly and patients. Since then, cancer patients became fighters of two fights - malignant disease and external aggressor. After more than a year of this reality Ukrainian oncologists would like to remind international society that the problem is not solved, and Ukrainians desperately need support.
Methods
It is generalized description of situation in the sphere of oncology in Ukraine since 24th of February 2022.
Results
According to Ukraine's Minister of Health, Victor Lyashko, during the first year of the war in Ukraine 1218 hospitals were damaged, 540 - partially destroyed and 173 destroyed completely. Among them - oncological hospitals. More than a million (∼1.2) Ukrainians currently stay on temporary occupied territories of the country and do not have access to qualified medical care. Around 7 million people had to move to safer areas of the country to stay safe and thousands of cancer patients had to move abroad for further treatment. It influenced the oncological landscape significantly. Oncological centers currently have to deal with 70% more patients than before the war. Moreover, the quantity of advanced stage disease has risen dramatically because a lot of people just couldn’t get medical help in time. Therefore, it caused bigger pressure on the medical system, requiring even more resources when they are so limited. At the same time, all clinical trials were put on pause leaving patients with advanced and rare diseases with no options for further treatment. Luckily, international society is extremely friendly to Ukraine providing Ukrainians with shelters and supplies, both material and intellectual. It helped and is helping a lot. But unfortunately, war is not over, and help is still needed.
Conclusions
The aim of the work is to show how things were going during this year of war and how they are actually going now for word to realize that even during the hardest time there is a place for high quality medical care. That only became possible thanks to huge support of international society, but there is still a lot to do to rebuild and improve reality that was destroyed on 24th of February.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1737P - Use of the predictive risk model LungFlagTM for lung cancer screening in screening in a Spanish reference center: A cost-effectiveness analysis
Presenter: Maria Eugenia Olmedo Garcia
Session: Poster session 23
1738P - Impact of digital platforms on exposure to tobacco and new smoking devices: A survey approach
Presenter: Diego de Haro
Session: Poster session 23
1739P - Lung cancer mortality patterns of tobacco users in the United States: A 21-year analysis (1999-2020)
Presenter: Seif Bugazia
Session: Poster session 23
1740P - Geolocation of respiratory tract cancer and its relationship with chronic exposure to PM2.5 pollutants
Presenter: Moisés González-Escamilla
Session: Poster session 23
1741P - Are physicians aware of lung cancer screening benefits and the importance of implementing this? Data from two public hospitals in Buenos Aires province, Argentina
Presenter: Valentin Vidal
Session: Poster session 23
1742P - Gender differences in incidence trends of early-onset GI cancer: The European perspective
Presenter: Irit Ben-Aharon
Session: Poster session 23
1743P - Bridging the gender gap in oncology: GEORGiNA'S quest for equality in academic research
Presenter: Khalid El Bairi
Session: Poster session 23
1744P - Socioeconomic inequalities in the diagnosis and treatment of colon cancer: A population-based English cancer registry study
Presenter: Benjamin Pickwell-Smith
Session: Poster session 23
1745P - Why do adult patients with cancer abandon treatment in India? A nationwide qualitative study to understand the perspectives of healthcare workers
Presenter: Reshma Ayiraveetil
Session: Poster session 23
1746P - Unintended consequences: Working time directives and oncology staff implications
Presenter: Simon Barry
Session: Poster session 23