Abstract 909P
Background
ACC is a neoplasm of salivary gland (SsG) characterized by biphasic ductal and myoepithelial components and solid, cribriform, and/or tubular architectural patterns (AP). Based on clinical and transcriptional features, two distinct subtypes are described: ACC-I (aggressive and mostly comprised of solid AP) and ACC-II (indolent and mainly represented by tubular and cribriform AP). Our ACC transcriptomic analysis revealed that TROP2 is upregulated, especially in the ACC-II subtype. TROP2 is a transmembrane glycoprotein involved in oncogenic pathways. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting TROP2 that showed promising results in metastatic breast cancer. Despite the clinical and biological heterogeneity of ACC, there is no difference in therapeutic strategies and no standard treatment for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) disease. Hence, we aimed to investigate TROP2 as a potential target for ACC.
Methods
Immunohistochemistry for TROP2 (EPR20043, 1:4000) was performed in a tissue microarray and manually scored as negative (< 1% of any intensity), weak (≤ 70% of weak or ≤ 30% of moderate expression), moderate (> 70% of weak or >30% of moderate or ≤ 30% of strong expression), and high (>70% of moderate or >30% of strong expression). The AP was grouped as non-solid (NS, tubular and/or cribriform), predominant solid (S), or S+NS subtypes. A TROP2 expressing ACC cell line from a PDX organoid was treated with SG for 72hrs, and viability was assessed through luminescent cell viability assay.
Results
Out of 165 ACCs, 64% were from minor and 24% from major SsG and 13% from other secretory glands. TROP2 expression was high in 59%, moderate in 30%, weak in 8%, and negative in 3%. NS ACC AP was significantly correlated (p<0.001) with high (73%) expression of TROP2 compared to S+NS (12% high) and S (17% high). SG impaired the viability of the ACC TROP2-positive cell line.
Conclusions
TROP2 is widely expressed in ACC, mainly in non-solid AP, and an anti-proliferative effect was observed in an ACC cell line treated with TROP2-ADC SG. Therefore, we provide a biological rationale for using TROP2 as a potential target for R/M ACC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
942P - Response to salvage chemotherapy with paclitaxel +/- cetuximab after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors in platinum-refractory recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) patients (CeTax study)
Presenter: Ruth Gabriela Herrera Gomez
Session: Poster session 12
944TiP - Randomized phase II study of immune stimulation with pembrolizumab and radiotherapy of recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma : The IMPORTANCE trial
Presenter: Bálint Tamaskovics
Session: Poster session 12
1089P - Adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) vs ipilimumab (IPI) in resected stage III/IV melanoma: 7-y results from CheckMate 238
Presenter: Paolo Ascierto
Session: Poster session 12
1090P - Outcome impact of time from complete resection to start of adjuvant immunotherapy in stage III-IV melanoma patients
Presenter: Sergio Martinez Recio
Session: Poster session 12
1092P - Adjuvant treatment with anti-PD-1 in acral melanoma patients: A nationwide study
Presenter: Manja Bloem
Session: Poster session 12
1093P - Neoadjuvant (NeoAd) intratumoral (IT) TAVO-EP (plasmid IL-12 electro gene transfer) in combination with nivolumab (NIVO) for patients (pts) with operable locoregionally advanced melanoma
Presenter: Ahmad Tarhini
Session: Poster session 12
1094P - Relapse free survival (RFS) at 3 years by pathological (path) response to neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) in patients (pts) with surgically resectable, high-risk melanoma
Presenter: Elizabeth Burton
Session: Poster session 12
1095P - Associations between baseline biomarkers and 3-year survival in the PRADO trial testing neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab in stage III melanoma
Presenter: Irene Reijers
Session: Poster session 12