Abstract 770P
Background
Scarce data have been published for elderly patients (pts) (≥70 years) with OC, who are often underrepresented in clinical trials. Trabectedin (T) plus PLD is approved for relapsed platinum-sensitive OC, and there is a need to gain insights into the safety and efficacy of this scheme in the elderly.
Methods
GEICO conducted a retrospective study with 15 Spanish hospitals, including pts ≥70 years at the start of T+PLD, with relapsed platinum-sensitive high-grade OC (platinum-free interval [PFI] ≥6 months). Pts received at least one cycle of T+PLD according to Summary of Product Characteristics between January 2015 and December 2019. Toxicity, efficacy, dosing, and patient characteristics data were extracted from medical charts.
Results
Forty-three pts with a median of 74 years (70-86) were recruited. The most common FIGO stage at diagnosis was IIIC (51.2%). At baseline, the median PFI was 9 months (81.4% 6-12, 18.6% >12), ECOG 0/1/2 (32.6%, 39.5%, 9.3%), 81.4% of pts had measurable disease, and 76.7% had relevant comorbidities (21.4% hypertension). The median of previous lines was 2 (1-5). The initial dose of T was 1.1 mg/m2 in 81.4% of pts and 79.1% received PLD 30 mg/m2 (reduced initial doses were given due to pts fragility). The median number of T+PLD cycles was 5 (1-21) (46.5% received ≥6 cycles) and 51.2% of pts had delayed infusions. Treatment ended due to personal decision (7.0%), medical decision (23.3%), progression (39.5%), toxicity (23.3%), and other (7.0%). There were no toxic deaths. The main G3-4 adverse reactions were neutropenia (18.6%), asthenia (11.6%), thrombocytopenia (7.0%), mucositis (4.7%), transaminitis (4.7%), and anemia (2.3%). The mPFS was 7.7 months (95% CI 4.4-9.4) with a favorable disease control rate of 72.1% (CR 9.3%, PR 32.6%, SD 30.2% RECIST 1.1). Median OS was 19.5 months (95% CI 12.8-27.2). Seven pts had s/gBRCA1/2 (16.2%) and 13 (30.2%) BRCA unknown. For BRCAmut, T+PLD response was CR 28.6%, PR 42.9%, SD 14.3%, PD 14.3%.
Conclusions
T+PLD is well tolerated by OC pts with 70 years or older. The adverse reactions are comparable to those published for younger pts and efficacy remains beneficial. Albeit in a small sample, a high overall response rate was observed for BRCAmut pts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO).
Funding
PharmaMar.
Disclosure
M.J. Rubio Perez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, MSD, GSK, Clovis, PharmaMar; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: AstraZeneca, MSD, GSK, Clovis. A. Manzano Fernández: Financial Interests, Invited Speaker: Sanofi, GSK, Clovis, AstraZeneca, PharmaMar, ROVI, Bayer, Leo Pharma; Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: GSK, AstraZeneca, Grunenthal; Financial Interests, Other, Travel expenses: GSK, Roche, AstraZeneca, Clovis, MSD; Financial Interests, Research Funding: AstraZeneca. P. Estevez Garcia: Financial Interests, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, MSD, GSK, Clovis, PharmaMar; Financial Interests, Research Funding: GSK; Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: AstraZeneca, MSD, GSK, Clovis, PharmaMar. M.D.M. Gordon Santiago: Financial Interests, Advisory Role: PharmaMar. E.M. Guerra Alia: Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: AstraZeneca-MSD, Clovis Oncology, GSK-Tesaro, PharmaMar, Roche; Financial Interests, Speaker’s Bureau: AstraZeneca-MSD, PharmaMar, Roche, GSK-Tesaro, Clovis; Financial Interests, Other, Travel expenses: Roche, GSK-Tesaro, Baxter. I. Romero: Financial Interests, Research Grant: Roche, AstraZeneca, GSK; Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: PharmaMar, Roche, AZ, GSK, MSD; Financial Interests, Speaker’s Bureau: PharmaMar, Roche, AZ, GSK, MSD. J. Martinez-Garcia: Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: AstraZeneca-MSD, GSK-Tesaro, PharmaMar; Financial Interests, Speaker’s Bureau: PharmaMar, GSK-Tesaro; Financial Interests, Other, Travel expenses: PharmaMar, GSK-Tesaro, MSD. A. Gonzalez Martin: Financial Interests, Advisory Role: Alkermes, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Clovis, Genmab, GSK, HederaDx, Immunogen, Illumina, Mersana, MSD, Novartis, Novocure, Oncoinvent, PharmaMar, Roche, SOTIO, SUTRO, Seagen, Takeda, Tubulis, Zailab. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
628P - Immunotherapy in mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Long-term outcome and novel predictive markers
Presenter: Amos Stemmer
Session: Poster session 11
629P - First results of the french prospective cohort of colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability (COLOMIN2)
Presenter: David Tougeron
Session: Poster session 11
630P - Determining a prognostic score using imaging to assess the benefit of combo anti-PD1 + anti-CTL4 vs anti-PD1 in patients with metastatic MSI/dMMR colorectal cancer (mCRC MSI)
Presenter: Remy Barbe
Session: Poster session 11
631P - Using the unique somatic mutation profile of POLE loss of proof-reading mutation helps in selection of patients who may benefit from immunotherapy
Presenter: Giulia Maddalena
Session: Poster session 11
632P - Predictive value of C-reactive protein (CRP) in microsatellite-stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients given first-line alternating short-course oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FLOX) and nivolumab
Presenter: Sebastian Meltzer
Session: Poster session 11
633P - Genomic alterations in SPEN predict outcome of immune checkpoint therapy in gastrointestinal cancer
Presenter: Changxiong Wu
Session: Poster session 11
634P - The ave-rec phase II trial of PD-L1/PD-1 blockade with avelumab plus chemoradiotherapy for resectable ESMO high risk rectal cancers
Presenter: Michael Michael
Session: Poster session 11
635P - Avelumab (AVE) combined with cetuximab (CET) and irinotecan (IRI) for the treatment of refractory microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): The AVETUXIRI phase II study
Presenter: Marc van den Eynde
Session: Poster session 11