Abstract 1659P
Background
Therapeutic possibilities in PDAC remain poor and access to tumor tissue for molecular profiling is still a challenge. The era of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or liquid biopsy facilitated molecular screening and treatment orientation in selected patients (pts).
Methods
Data from PDAC pts who underwent liquid biopsy at the Drug Development Department (DITEP) at Gustave Roussy were collected. The primary objective was to assess the ability of liquid biopsy to find molecular alterations (MA), orient and include pts in early phase clinical trials. We evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) on matched therapy (PFS2) compared to PFS on prior therapy (PFS1). Treatment efficacy was considered by focusing on the percentage of patients with a PFS2 that was 1.5 times greater than the PFS1, based on a standard calculation (PFS2/PFS1), and a modified formula (mPFSr) with mPFSr = postPFS/prePFS with postPFS = PFS2 if PFS2 < 6 months and postPFS = 24 months if PFS2 > 6 months; prePFS = PFS1 if PFS1 > 2 months and prePFS = 2 months if PFS1 < 2 months.
Results
Between January 2020 to November 2022, a total of 31 pts were included in the study. The main characteristics were as follow: median age of 62 years (32-81), median number of previous lines of treatment of 2 (0-4) and median ECOG Performance Status of 0 (0-2). Finally, 30 patients had a liquid biopsy at progression on their last treatment line. Targetable MA (FGFR, KRAS…) were found in 8 pts (27%), and 5 patients (17%) received a matched targeted therapy in an early phase clinical trial. FGFR alterations were the most frequent and 3 patients (60%) received FGFR inhibitors. From the 5 patients matched and treated, one patient (20%) had a PFS2/PFS1 ratio > 1.5 and three pts (60%) had an mPFSr > 1.5. With a median follow-up time of 12.3 months (9.2-NR), the overall response rate was 20%, the overall control rate was 100% and the median overall survival was not reached (8.5-NR months).
Conclusions
These results suggest that molecular profiling-matched therapy assessed by liquid biopsy could improve the therapeutic field in pancreatic cancer. However, only a small proportion of patients are matched and treated. Randomised trials are needed to confirm the value of this treatment method in pancreatic cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Dr. S. Ponce Aix (DITEP, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Hollebecque: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier, Incyte, EISAI; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Basilea, Tahio, Relay Therapeutics, QED Therapeutics, Debiopharm, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Incyte; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, M19-345: AbbVie; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, CO42216; WP42627; CO40939: Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, MCLA-158: Merus; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, SGNB6A: Seattle Genetics; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, TAS-120-202: Tahio; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Krystal-10: Mirati; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, ADP-0033: Adaptimmune; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, ACT16902: Sanofi; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, C4201002: Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, RLY-4008: Relay Therapeutics; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, CC-90011: Celgene/BMS; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Loxo-IDH: Loxo/Lilly; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, SN-201 study: Sotio; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Tropics-03: Gilead; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, BI1403: Boehringer Ingelheim.
Resources from the same session
1644P - The mutation landscape and evolution pattern of liver or peritoneal metastasis in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Guoliang Yao
Session: Poster session 22
1645P - STAT3, ACTA2, and SPARC stromal markers predict response to Gemcitabine/Cisplatin/Nab-paclitaxel (GCN) in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (apdac)
Presenter: Himil Mahadevia
Session: Poster session 22
1646P - Genomic and prognostic differences in patients with different KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Chunwei Xu
Session: Poster session 22
1647P - Cancer-associated endocrine cell: A novel component of tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Yuan Chen
Session: Poster session 22
1648P - Association between circulating tumor cell count and thrombosis in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Monica Benavente
Session: Poster session 22
1649P - Comprehensive genomic profiling contributes to the prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Eiichiro So
Session: Poster session 22
1650P - Identification of potential targets in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: The KRAS Wild-Type subset
Presenter: Daniel Acosta Eyzaguirre
Session: Poster session 22
1651P - Comparison of surgical outcome and prognostic factors between pancreaticobiliary and intestinal types of periampullary adenocarcinoma following pancreaticoduodenectomy
Presenter: Saad Anwar
Session: Poster session 22
1652P - Interaction between enhanced cytokine signalling and ferroptosis defence fuels obesity-associated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma oncogenesis
Presenter: Rishat Ruzi
Session: Poster session 22
1653P - The activated thermogenesis of intra-pancreatic fat fuels the progression of pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Xi'n'peng Yin
Session: Poster session 22