Abstract 1659P
Background
Therapeutic possibilities in PDAC remain poor and access to tumor tissue for molecular profiling is still a challenge. The era of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or liquid biopsy facilitated molecular screening and treatment orientation in selected patients (pts).
Methods
Data from PDAC pts who underwent liquid biopsy at the Drug Development Department (DITEP) at Gustave Roussy were collected. The primary objective was to assess the ability of liquid biopsy to find molecular alterations (MA), orient and include pts in early phase clinical trials. We evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) on matched therapy (PFS2) compared to PFS on prior therapy (PFS1). Treatment efficacy was considered by focusing on the percentage of patients with a PFS2 that was 1.5 times greater than the PFS1, based on a standard calculation (PFS2/PFS1), and a modified formula (mPFSr) with mPFSr = postPFS/prePFS with postPFS = PFS2 if PFS2 < 6 months and postPFS = 24 months if PFS2 > 6 months; prePFS = PFS1 if PFS1 > 2 months and prePFS = 2 months if PFS1 < 2 months.
Results
Between January 2020 to November 2022, a total of 31 pts were included in the study. The main characteristics were as follow: median age of 62 years (32-81), median number of previous lines of treatment of 2 (0-4) and median ECOG Performance Status of 0 (0-2). Finally, 30 patients had a liquid biopsy at progression on their last treatment line. Targetable MA (FGFR, KRAS…) were found in 8 pts (27%), and 5 patients (17%) received a matched targeted therapy in an early phase clinical trial. FGFR alterations were the most frequent and 3 patients (60%) received FGFR inhibitors. From the 5 patients matched and treated, one patient (20%) had a PFS2/PFS1 ratio > 1.5 and three pts (60%) had an mPFSr > 1.5. With a median follow-up time of 12.3 months (9.2-NR), the overall response rate was 20%, the overall control rate was 100% and the median overall survival was not reached (8.5-NR months).
Conclusions
These results suggest that molecular profiling-matched therapy assessed by liquid biopsy could improve the therapeutic field in pancreatic cancer. However, only a small proportion of patients are matched and treated. Randomised trials are needed to confirm the value of this treatment method in pancreatic cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Dr. S. Ponce Aix (DITEP, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Hollebecque: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier, Incyte, EISAI; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Basilea, Tahio, Relay Therapeutics, QED Therapeutics, Debiopharm, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Incyte; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, M19-345: AbbVie; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, CO42216; WP42627; CO40939: Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, MCLA-158: Merus; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, SGNB6A: Seattle Genetics; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, TAS-120-202: Tahio; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Krystal-10: Mirati; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, ADP-0033: Adaptimmune; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, ACT16902: Sanofi; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, C4201002: Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, RLY-4008: Relay Therapeutics; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, CC-90011: Celgene/BMS; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Loxo-IDH: Loxo/Lilly; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, SN-201 study: Sotio; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, Tropics-03: Gilead; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, BI1403: Boehringer Ingelheim.
Resources from the same session
1634P - Extensive molecular profiling of KRAS wild-type versus KRAS mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on 233 patients
Presenter: Jeanne Lena
Session: Poster session 22
1635P - Germline pathogenic variants of cancer predisposition genes in a multicentre Italian cohort of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients
Presenter: Giulia Orsi
Session: Poster session 22
1636P - Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profile in patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer (PC): A multicenter experience and challenges for clinical application
Presenter: Francisco Muñoz i Carrillo
Session: Poster session 22
1637P - Early retention of KRAS mutations in cfDNA is an ominous sign for pancreatic cancer patients during chemotherapy: A prospective cohort study
Presenter: Chien-Jui Huang
Session: Poster session 22
1638P - The prognostic and predictive role of class III β-tubulin and hENT1 expression in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Taha Koray Sahin
Session: Poster session 22
1639P - Feasibility of tumor genomic sequencing on tissue obtained from endoscopic ultrasound in patients with pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Vaia Florou
Session: Poster session 22
1640P - Response monitoring with ctDNA in metastatic pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Jinwoo Ahn
Session: Poster session 22
1642P - Prognostic impact of an immunomorphological signature integrating immune, fibroblastic and tumor markers in a series of 217 resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients
Presenter: Franck MONNIEN
Session: Poster session 22
1643P - Clinical outcomes of FOLFIRINOX as front-line therapy in patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Asian retrospective study of 781 patients
Presenter: Kyunghye Bang
Session: Poster session 22