Abstract 1273P
Background
ctDNA-based molecular residual disease (MRD) detection of postoperative plasma enables refining risk stratification to guide treatment precisely. The clinical efficacy of MNavigator V1 utilizing fixed panel detection scheme has been confirmed and published. Here, we reported its V2 improved version performance.
Methods
MNavigator V2 strategy combines the advantages of two classic technologies, WES-based personalized and non-customized off-the-shelf assay. In this assay, tissue somatic mutations were identified by CGP-sequencing with a 2.3 Mb 1021-gene panel, and then the top-ranked 20 mutations were selected. Tissue-specific customized panel combined with a lung universal core panel to monitor MRD by sequencing depth > 100,000x. The core panel can detect de novo mutations in ctDNA, especially targeted treatment-resistant mutations. Analytical validation was performed on a commercial MRD reference standard set, with VAF down to 0.005%. The retrospective cohort included 33 NSCLC patients (pts) treated with definitive surgery. Head-to-head compared MRD detection of this assay with MNavigator V1 that uses a 338-gene panel with a sequencing depth of 30,000x.
Results
This assay demonstrated the sample-level LOD of 0.005% by monitoring 20 variants, with a specificity of 100%. 10,625 NSCLC 1021panel sequencing data indicates 99% of pts available monitor 2 mutations, achieving 97.3% analytical sensitivity at 0.02% VAF. In the cohort, MRD was detected in 14/15 relapsed pts by both assays, apart from a brain-only metastasis pt. Recurrence-free pts with 2 years of follow-up were MRD-negative, yielding a specificity of 100% (18/18). MRD-detectable population was associated with a worse prognosis (HR=35.4). MNavigator V2 predicted relapse with a lead time of 143 days, 15 days ahead of V1. This may be related to more traced mutations (average 10 vs 5) and deeper sequencing depth, improving the capability to detect minimal tumor DNA residuals.
Conclusions
The CGP-based personalized MRD assay showed high analytical performance, and clinical assessment indicated superior sensitivity than fixed panel assays, providing greater potential for clinical benefit.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
W. Gao.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
457P - Disparities in receipt of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy as therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the real-world setting
Presenter: Gretchen Kimmick
Session: Poster session 04
458P - Metastatic breast cancer: How and how often do we communicate? Results from an Italian national survey
Presenter: Camilla Lisanti
Session: Poster session 04
460P - Impact of fulvestrant utilization on prognostic outcome among patients with HR+ve/HER2-ve metastatic breast cancer: Results from a real-world dataset
Presenter: Shaheenah Dawood
Session: Poster session 04
462P - Health outcomes of treatment sequences with eribulin or other single agents’ chemotherapy for treating relapsed metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Simone Rivolo
Session: Poster session 04
463P - Impact of two waves of Sars-Cov-2 outbreak on the clinical presentation and outcomes of newly referred breast cancer cases at AP-HP: A retrospective multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Sonia Priou
Session: Poster session 04
464P - Developing a prognostic risk stratification model and treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis
Presenter: JiaXin Chen
Session: Poster session 04
465P - Reporting of older subgroups enrolled to registration breast cancer trials, 2012-2021
Presenter: Colm Mac Eochagain
Session: Poster session 04