Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 22

1644P - The mutation landscape and evolution pattern of liver or peritoneal metastasis in pancreatic cancer

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 22

Topics

Pathology/Molecular Biology

Tumour Site

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Presenters

Guoliang Yao

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S895-S924. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01944-0

Authors

G. Yao1, Q. Zhang2, Y. Tan2, Q. Duan2, D. Chen2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology - Kaiyuan Campus, 410300 - Luoyang/CN
  • 2 The Medical Department, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd., 210042 - Nanjing/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1644P

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been found to metastasize in more than 50% of patients at the time of their initial diagnosis. This is considered to be the main reason for mortality. The liver and peritoneum are frequently observed as metastatic locations in cases of PDAC. The mutational profile and evolutionary patterns of metastatic lesions in the liver and peritoneum in pancreatic cancer remain poorly understood.

Methods

Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on 47 samples from 30 treatment-naïve, synchronously resected hepatic or peritoneal metastatic PDACs. The present study examined 10 primary tumours that did not metastasize within a year after surgery (non-PTs), 8 matched pairs of liver-metastatic primary (LiM-PTs) and metastatic (LiM-MTs), 9 matched pairs of peritoneal-metastatic primary (PeM-PTs), and 3 unpaired primary and metastatic tumours.

Results

KRAS mutations were found in 89.65% (26/29) of primary tumours, 70% (7/10) of liver metastases, and 100% (8/8) of peritoneal metastases. Interestingly, PCDHB14 and PXDN mutations were only detected in non-PTs, MUC16 were only detected in LiM-PTs, and ZNF594 were only detected in PeM-PTs, although there was no statistical difference. Meanwhile, the LiM-MTs group had higher TMB than PeM-MTs group (P=0.048). Mutation pattern analysis found that transitions outnumbered transversions in all samples. The paired LiM-PTs and PeM-PTs samples underwent GO and KEGG analyses. The ECM-receptor interaction signaling pathway that has been linked to metastasis in other cancer types was found to be distinct in LiM-PTs as compared to other groups. On the other hand, the proteoglycans and calcium signaling pathway was found to be unique to LiM-MTs when compared to PeM-MTs. Phylogenetic relationships analysis found that neither the LiM group nor the PeM group has a unified evolutionary pattern.

Conclusions

This research reveals that PDAC liver metastasis and peritoneal metastasis differ in mutated genes and evolutionary pattern. These results suggest that different biological mechanisms may exist in metastasis to different sites, and also highlights the need for more precise personalized treatment for PDAC in clinical practice.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The first affiliated hospital of Henan university of science and technology.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.