Abstract 2046P
Background
Effective communication between doctors and patients is crucial, especially when delivering bad news that can impact a person's present and future expectations. However, acquiring optimal skills in breaking bad news requires the incorporation of multiple professional competencies that are acquired gradually through years of training. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of existing literature on medical education programs and interventions aiming to improve communication skills and to critically evaluate the effectiveness of such training.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed and Scopus databases at February 2023, using the key words “medical education,” “breaking bad news,” and “end of life communication.”
Results
Our search yielded 21 relevant studies, with 12 randomized studies indicating improvements in trainees found in PubMed, while four Scopus studies referred to workshops and seminars that increased participants' confidence in various communication areas. Furthermore, eight studies referred to training courses on communication techniques that helped medical students and health professionals develop confidence in breaking bad news skills. One study utilized interactive theater and role-play with professional actors to teach breaking bad news to medical students, which can be a potentially powerful tool for teaching breaking bad news during medical education. One study showed that the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted health education due to social distancing.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that training physicians at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels in communication skills for breaking bad news can be beneficial for both physicians and patients. However, limitations exist in reaching definitive conclusions. As digital learning has emerged in healthcare education during the post-COVID-19 period, digital solutions have also been examined for training in the communication of bad news.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2056P - Hospitalization, reconsultations and mortality in the field of oncological emergencies: Who is at higher risk?
Presenter: Eugenia María Martínez Madrid
Session: Poster session 06
2057P - Prevalence of frailty in long-term prostate cancer survivors after radical prostatectomy and its association with quality of life and emotional health
Presenter: Valentin Meissner
Session: Poster session 06
2058P - Reducing waste to improve sustainability and affordability of cancer treatment: Redispensing unused oral anticancer drugs
Presenter: Lisa-Marie Smale
Session: Poster session 06
2059P - The impact of a dental oncology clinic for patients (pts) prescribed bone-modifying agents (BMA) in a cancer centre
Presenter: Harriet Byrne
Session: Poster session 06
2060P - Prevalence and predictor of poor mental adjustment to cancer before lung cancer surgery
Presenter: Junhee Park
Session: Poster session 06
2061P - Network analysis of comprehensive concerns in patients with cancer: Differences between the sexes
Presenter: Kazumasa Yamamoto
Session: Poster session 06
2062P - The psychological distress (PsyD) evaluation in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients (pts): A mono-institutional analysis
Presenter: Maria Bensi
Session: Poster session 06
2063P - Lifestyle changes as cancer treatment: It is time to get specific with our patients
Presenter: Ana Isabel Martin Quesada
Session: Poster session 06
2064P - Hospitalisation of patients with cancer: Identifying points for improvement in patient care in a university hospital in Spain
Presenter: Silvia Roa
Session: Poster session 06
2065P - Communication on the first medical oncology appointment: What do cancer patients want?
Presenter: Rodrigo Vicente
Session: Poster session 06